The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6082 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ariane Burgess
Yes.
10:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ariane Burgess
There are parts of Scotland where people do not know what the crofting community is doing on neighbouring land. That is just what is happening with the land use patterns now.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ariane Burgess
There is perhaps something in there. I am talking about grazings committees, but there are also volunteer organisations that set up development trusts, which do a lot of work and do amazing things, and that is hard work, too. It is something to look at.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ariane Burgess
I want to explore the idea of the Land Court expanding its jurisdiction to become an environmental court, which, according to the policy memorandum, could be considered in the future. There is an on-going breach in Scotland of the Aarhus convention’s access to justice requirements. People cannot get access to justice because of the cost of taking forward litigation. Is there an opportunity to speed up the process and follow the requirements? In a 2025 update, the relevant United Nations committee described Scotland as failing to guarantee compliant environmental justice. Is there an opportunity to explore and bring forward the Land Court’s expansion, rather than consider it in the future?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ariane Burgess
It is primarily engaged with farming, crofting and land issues, and an awful lot of environmental issues take place on land. It is worth considering that point.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ariane Burgess
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ariane Burgess
My understanding of anything that the Government and Parliament are doing is that there is always work going on. Bills are part of a process to unlock powers, and to give powers either to ministers, councillors or public bodies. I understand that work is on-going, but the situation seems to be somewhat urgent. I get that Environmental Standards Scotland is in place, but organisations are having to take forward judicial reviews, which is very costly. What organisations and the UN are looking for is access to more affordable justice.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ariane Burgess
On the question around the carbon issue, there is a case to be made for the work of Jill Robbie and her idea around a public carbon trust, which could be Scotland-wide. It could be worth looking into that.
I have a question about transparency in what is going on in common grazings committees. As the convener said, in some cases, they are not really active. In some parts of Scotland, in the crofting counties, not everybody is part of the crofting community, and some people are part of the community but are not involved in the committee. From talking to constituents, I have picked up that there is no transparency around what is going on in common grazings. They feel that things are being done to them, even though they are members of the community.
Section 16 requires
“a public meeting to appoint a new grazings committee”
and for the Crofting Commission to be notified of that, so there is something there, but could we have more transparency about the activities of the grazings committee and what is happening on the land? I also wonder whether, in some cases, grazings committees will fall under the new legislation that is coming in. The Land Reform (Scotland) Bill—when it becomes an act—and the land management plans could help in those cases.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ariane Burgess
Earlier, my colleague Beatrice Wishart made the point that racing is not taking place at Thornton, and you said that Thornton is not so busy at the moment partly because of the work that this committee is doing and partly because of your work. We also had evidence of that from the call for views. The owner’s view is that it will move towards a more GBGB approach. However, given what you have said about what happened at the other track, if that approach was taken, we still could not have confidence in GBGB regulating and doing a good job.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Ariane Burgess
Yes. More transparency for communities is the general direction of travel that we are heading in, is it not? The land reform legislation introduced more transparency, so that communities know what is happening on the land around them. In this case, it might be about a grazings committee.