The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5030 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Before I ask my main question, which is on penalties, I want to back to Elena Whitham’s question about the use of “theft” rather than “abduction”. The term “abduction” was used in a piece of UK legislation. Do we have a specific definition of “abduction” in Scotland that relates to people rather than pets or things? I just want clarification on that. Is that why we have gone with “dog theft” rather than “abduction”? Laura, you are nodding your head.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Can you say anything about it now? Is there a specific use of the word “abduction” that provides the reason why we have not gone with it?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Not now—exactly. This is just your warm-up.
I will move on to a question about penalties. I will direct it to Laura Buchan in the first instance and then open it up to whoever wants to come in. I am interested in your views on the penalties that are included in the bill. Would you expect the provisions in the bill to have any impact on prosecution or sentencing when the new offence is used?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
I imagine that my colleague Maurice Golden considered it pretty closely in the process of developing the bill. It would be interesting to ask him those questions when he comes in front of us.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Stuart, you said that we do not have much in the way of sentencing guidelines. Are you saying that creating precedents through having such guidelines is not a door that we want to open?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Would the proposed sentencing framework allow courts to properly reflect the emotional harm that is experienced by victims instead of just the monetary value of the dog?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Are you saying that you would like the sentencing guidelines to account explicitly for the sentience of the dogs, to ensure consistency and recognition of the bond between the owner and the animal?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
You have not gone there yet.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Louise, do you want to come in on how you are approaching damp and mould and your understanding of what is going on in the stock? I want to get a sense of whether you are identifying damp and mould in particular stock. You said that you have 29 non-standard housing types. Have you identified that damp and mould are showing up in particular types of stock or are they across the board?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
That is great. I will pause you there, because we have more questions on that. I will leave some responses for colleagues, who might ask about that.
Murray, do you want to come in on the numbers increasing in relation to dampness and mould?