The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6834 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Ariane Burgess
It is good to hear your recognition that this is a contentious issue and that something needs to be done about it. I am minded not to move amendment 138 if I can have some assurance that, as the minister has said, the Government is willing to take forward some level of consultation and get to the bottom of the matter. It is a problem in communities if there is an imbalance, although I recognise that there is history to take into account, as well as familial relationships with places.
However, it is an issue that we need to consider. As I said earlier, there are around 800 people who really want to croft, but they cannot access one. We absolutely need to have more people on the land. As Andrew Thin said, we must transform the way in which we use our land and move from the current suboptimal approach to one that ensures that our land flourishes and thrives.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Ariane Burgess
That is something that I wanted to get a better sense of. Perhaps there is a communication issue here if there are measures in place that people can access, but it is good to hear that you are looking at revising CAGS to make it more accessible for crofters to do the things that they want to do, especially given the big push for the ecological restoration that needs to be taking place across our land. I will keep track of these developments and what you are looking at with regard to CAGS.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Ariane Burgess
Expanding the practice of crofting into other counties in Scotland has been talked about for quite a long time. Can the minister give any assurances about what work might be done in that area? It would be nice to get to a point at which we are not just talking about it but doing some work on the ground.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 February 2026
Ariane Burgess
I appreciate what the minister said about a commitment to do further work, but I am minded to press amendment 154.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ariane Burgess
Agenda item 4 is formal consideration of the motions on the three SSIs that we have just taken evidence on. I invite the minister to move motions S6M-20366, S6M-20365 and S6M-20509, noting that he spoke to the instruments earlier.
Motions moved,
That the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee recommends that the Visitor Levy (Local Authority Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2026 [draft] be approved.
That the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee recommends that the Visitor Levy (Reviews and Appeals) (Scotland) Regulations 2026 [draft] be approved.
That the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee recommends that the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Act 2024 Amendment Regulations 2026 [draft] be approved.—[Ivan McKee]
Motions agreed to.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ariane Burgess
Thank you. So, the bill cannot prevent such situations for legal reasons, but they can be prevented through the checks and balances in the local authority sphere.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ariane Burgess
Okay—thanks. We move on to questions from Fulton MacGregor on exemptions.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ariane Burgess
Lots of different tiers—let us focus on that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ariane Burgess
The original act included a percentage, and now we are bringing in a fixed or tiered flat rate. After the act was enforced, there were concerns about the percentage rate. We have heard in previous evidence sessions that the percentage rate could be challenging for smaller providers. Could you explain what you unearthed in that regard?
Charging a percentage rate is a progressive approach. If that approach could have worked everywhere, it would have been great for everyone, because it is a fairer way of administering the levy. What were some of the issues that led you to realise that there was a need for variety? I know that we are aiming for flexibility and simplicity, but were there some technical issues in the background that made the percentage approach unworkable?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Ariane Burgess
That was helpful. Thank you.
I want to explore the issue of whether different approaches—a percentage system and a tiered flat-rate system—could be used in the same area. Will the bill allow a council to run two different visitor levy approaches for accommodation in the same area? Could one business end up being subject to a percentage system and a flat-rate system?