The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5056 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ariane Burgess
Thanks very much. It is helpful to have that overview of the steps required.
I will start by asking why the legislation is required. What is preventing councils from introducing such a tax now? Does anything in previous legislation expressly forbid local authorities from raising their own income? Additionally, why did the Scottish Government decide to introduce enabling legislation with, potentially, 32 local levies rather than introducing a national tourist tax?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ariane Burgess
Thanks very much for that.
I come back to the question on clarification of why you chose to introduce what could be 32 local levies, rather than just a national tourist tax.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ariane Burgess
That is a good point. There is potential for more.
Related to that question, we are aware that there might be, for example, high numbers of day-trippers who stay in Edinburgh and travel out but do not stay overnight. Could it be that those other areas continue to shoulder the cost of delivering and maintaining the services used by tourists but do not receive any benefit from the legislation? Have you given any thought to that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ariane Burgess
Yes, so it is something that they might draw out in a consultation. That is great.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ariane Burgess
I have a follow-up question. I totally take the point that it is up to the local authority to run a consultation on scheme design. Ben Haynes mentioned the north coast 500: I wonder about hospitality issues in the Highland Council area, for example. In your work to develop the bill, did you come across any thinking around using some of the money to train people into the hospitality sector, as is much needed at the moment?
10:15Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ariane Burgess
We have a little bit of time in hand.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ariane Burgess
Okay—that is something that a local authority could look into in its consultation.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ariane Burgess
Great—thanks very much.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ariane Burgess
I will pick up on something that you might have said in your opening remarks, Ben, but that you also mentioned when you were talking to Ivan McKee about local authorities. You said that the system would be reported on every year. Will it be reported on to the Scottish Government?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 June 2023
Ariane Burgess
On the back of that—Robin, you might have covered this in your response—I would be interested to hear whether, if a council decided to apply a levy in part of its area but not in others, there would be a case for any revenue that is raised to be spent in that same geographical area?