The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6761 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Okay, great. Thanks very much. I will go to Elin Williamson next—no, sorry, I actually have a question for Orkney Islands Council first. Christie Hartley, Scotland’s three all-island local authorities have decided against introducing a visitor levy at this time. Speaking on behalf of them, could you give us a view as to why Orkney Islands Council has decided that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Thanks very much for that clarity. That is a good point about the cruise ships.
I know that other witnesses have not had a chance to speak yet, but in the interests of time, I will move on to the theme of changes to the basis on which a visitor levy can be charged. I will bring in Meghan Gallacher, who has a number of questions. Meghan, I hope that you can bring in the people who have not spoken yet.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
If the consultation period was shorter, what would be a reasonable amount of time to shorten it to?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
So you think that you could have done it in six weeks.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
From talking to colleagues, is your sense that the 18-month period could reasonably be shortened?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Fergus Murray, you indicated that you wanted to come in, but I will move on and bring in Alexander Stewart, who has questions on additional flexibility—that seems to be today’s word of the day—around the different fixed-amount models. You might want to speak to that issue, and then you can respond to other bits as well.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Please just go ahead.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Gareth Dixon, in the discussions with the Government and with colleagues, has any shorter period been discussed as to what would be reasonable?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
No, not at this stage. Okay. Meghan Gallacher wants to come back in—very briefly, please.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
In our second evidence session on the Visitor Levy (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill, we will focus on the views of the tourism industry. We are joined in the room by Marc Crothall from the Scottish Tourism Alliance, and Fiona MacConnacher from Booking.com; and we are joined online by Fiona Campbell from the Association of Scotland’s Self-Caterers, Sheila Gilmore from VisitArran, and David Weston from the Scottish Bed & Breakfast Association. I welcome you all to the meeting. Thank you for joining us today, particularly given the short notice and the tight timescales for the bill.
On a technical issue, there is no need for you to turn on your microphones—we will do that for you.
Those of you who were watching the previous evidence session will know that we are very short on time, so I will be reining us all in and directing questions to specific people.
My first question is for Marc Crothall. We will be asking pretty much the same questions as we asked the previous witnesses. I am interested in hearing the industry’s perspective on how engagement has worked. What have you discussed with the Government and asked it to change? What progress have you seen in relation to the bill?