The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5030 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
Hang on a minute—I am being passed a note. Colleagues, the first agenda item should have been to decide whether to take items three and four in private, not items four and five. Do we agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
Did you just say that fisheries are not included in the regional marine plans? Why is that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
Spatial management.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
I have a question on compliance and enforcement. I would like to explore that and understand how it is being considered in the IFMI programme.
Various information has come to us. For example, we have seen that a 2017 investigation by the European Court of Auditors identified less-dissuasive fisheries sanctions and greater levels of reoffending in Scotland than exist in other European countries, and we have been given anecdotal information indicating that certain activities that adversely impact marine species and habitats have continued to occur with few repercussions because of a lack of enforcement. At our 26 October round-table discussion on inshore fisheries, concerns were raised around the lack of enforcement of management in the marine protected areas—I know that there are plans for that, but we need to get on with it. Concerns were also raised about the lack of sufficient information and data to ensure transparency and accountability, and about the need for more enhanced sanctions for non-compliance. There is quite a lot in there. Will the IFMI process help in that regard? It is a bit embarrassing that Scotland has a higher level of reoffending than other European countries, is it not?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
You described the list of tools: spatial management, temporal management, licence and quota—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
Like the cod box.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
So it is temporal and spatial.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
That would be very helpful.
At the beginning, you said that the “stakeholder landscape is difficult” and that there is polarisation, but there is something that everyone around the table has in common: they want to ensure that fisheries can operate over the long term. I invite you to look for that common ground—the Scottish Government is doing great work in other areas on a common-ground approach—by working through the FMAC group, RIFGs and so on to move to facilitation that helps people to get out of polarisation, because what is happening is just retraumatising people. Fishers are just trying to make a living, and ENGOs are trying to secure a long-term future for the people of Scotland that serves the public interest. I invite the marine directorate to step into the space to help to make that happen. If we keep saying that there is polarisation and that things are very difficult, that is what we will get. If we can support people to see what we have in common—our shared interest—that will help us to move forward in, I hope, a better way.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
I appreciate that, and it has been helpful to hear about the broader context and the other strands of work apart from the IFMI programme. However, as part of our budget work, the committee committed a session to the marine directorate’s financing. We are trying to help you. It seems to me that there are problems, because pieces of work start, then seem to stop. I want to frame the conversation in that context.
You are starting something new with the IFMI programme, but you did not even acknowledge the other pieces of work, which I had to tease out. I loved what Helen Downie said about the branches—I could visualise them—but let us include the other pieces of work, too, so that we understand everything that is going on. I know that things are complex, but we are smart thinkers and it is helpful if we can see the full picture so that we can help with the challenging situation in inshore waters.
09:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
Thank you.