The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5737 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Ariane Burgess
I think that Gordon MacDonald has a supplementary question about brownfield sites.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Ariane Burgess
To clarify, you said that you disagree, but it is not necessarily about the planning fee; it is the ring-fenced nature of the—
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Ariane Burgess
That is very helpful. Those are quite big figures, so we need to take a big step from where we are now with employment if we are to support the just transition aspect of NPF4.
I might be going a little bit off piste, but on my commute from my home to Edinburgh, when going through the Aberdeen area, I often encounter folks who have just come onshore or who are about to go offshore. From talking to them, I know that the job package that they get is very attractive—startlingly attractive, actually. What can the renewables sector do to attract people to the industry? I was talking to one person recently who said that the oil and gas industry is still the way to go, so there is work to be done to help people to understand the opportunities.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Ariane Burgess
Good morning and welcome to the 15th meeting in 2024 of the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee. I remind all members and witnesses to ensure that their devices are in silent mode. Pam Gosal and Stephanie Callaghan are joining us online, and we have received apologies from Mark Griffin.
The first item on our agenda is to decide whether to take items 4, 5 and 6 in private. Are members content to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Ariane Burgess
It would be interesting to see how things develop a year from now. Mairi Maciver, you have indicated that you want to come in.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Ariane Burgess
Does anybody have anything to add?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Ariane Burgess
Morag Ferguson or Mairi Maciver, would one of you like to come in? Morag is nodding.
09:15Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Ariane Burgess
Can I just come in? You are saying that on policy 1 there is uncertainty about how to respond to the nature requirements. Why is that so important? I think that people understand the climate emergency, but what is going on in nature that makes it so important and puts it at a high level and makes it the first thing that we come to when we read NPF4?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Ariane Burgess
Thanks for your useful points. The challenge is that where the wind blows in Scotland there is a lot of peat.
I will bring in Gordon MacDonald with a couple of questions.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2024
Ariane Burgess
The next item is to take evidence on the committee’s annual review of national planning framework 4 from two panels of witnesses. On our first panel, we are joined in the room by Ian Aikman, who is the chair of Heads of Planning Scotland, and David Givan, who is the chief planning officer at the City of Edinburgh Council. We are joined online by Morag Ferguson and Mairi Maciver, who are both planning managers at the Comhairle nan Eilean Siar. I welcome all the witnesses to our meeting. I love the backdrops of the witnesses who are online. Thank you for that—they are really lovely.
I remind members and those who are participating in the session that there are active legal proceedings concerning the interpretation of NPF4 policies and the interaction between those policies and existing local plans. Under the Parliament’s standing orders,
“A member may not in the proceedings of the Parliament refer to any matter in relation to which legal proceedings are active except to the extent permitted by the Presiding Officer.”
Although we do not wish the discussion and debate to be unduly restricted, I ask members and witnesses to avoid referencing specific matters that are currently before the courts.
We turn to questions. We will try to direct our questions to a specific witness where possible, but if you would like to come in please indicate that to the clerks. I ask Morag Ferguson and Mairi Maciver to indicate that they want to come in by typing R in the chat function. There is no need for you to turn your microphones on and off because our broadcast team will do that. Morag and Mairi should note that there might be a slight delay before their mic is turned on. Do not worry about that; we are aware of the pause.
I will begin with a couple of questions. I will direct the first question to Ian Aikman. The committee keeps on hearing calls for the Scottish Government to establish a hierarchy of NPF4 policy priorities. The idea of doing so would be to assist decision makers and developers. Do you think that that would be a good approach? If you do, why? If you do not, why not?