Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 4 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 5030 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

A Climate Transition for Scottish Agriculture

Meeting date: 12 March 2025

Ariane Burgess

I want to pick up on the issue of what policy supports or mechanisms would be most effective in helping farmers. Kate Rowell talked about the lack of certainty and the lack of young people coming into the sector. Right at the beginning, Pete Ritchie talked about how tier 4 should be a priority. There is something in there about the education space. I would be interested to hear more about the education that is necessary in order for us not only to transition to a new way of doing things, but to get more people into the sector. We are talking about a sector that is losing people.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

A Climate Transition for Scottish Agriculture

Meeting date: 12 March 2025

Ariane Burgess

We have touched on how the agricultural transition in Scotland is being communicated. A moment ago, Jim Walker said that farmers feel disconnected from the Government. Kate Rowell, what feedback have you received from farmers on how the agricultural transition is being communicated? What discussions have there been about the potential impact on farmers’ day-to-day lives?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Petitions

Meeting date: 11 March 2025

Ariane Burgess

No one else has comments, so the question is whether we agree to close the petition on the basis of the responses that we have had from the Scottish Government. In doing so, we could write to the Scottish Government highlighting the need for it to continue to engage with rented sector stakeholders on the issue. As Meghan Gallacher and Mark Griffin have highlighted, the Housing (Scotland) Bill affords the opportunity for individual members to lodge amendments on the matter. It has been great that the petition has been lodged and the issue highlighted.

Do members agree with those suggestions?

Members indicated agreement.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Petitions

Meeting date: 11 March 2025

Ariane Burgess

I agree that stage 2 of the bill will give us the opportunity to lodge amendments in order to address the issues that are raised by the petition. The petitioner did great work in lodging the petition and flagging elements around the landlord registration scheme.

Do members agree to close the petition?

Members indicated agreement.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Petitions

Meeting date: 11 March 2025

Ariane Burgess

We now have the opportunity to consider three public petitions that have been referred to us by the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. The first petition that is under consideration is PE1743, on amending the law to protect the rights of pre-1989 Scottish secure tenants. Do members have any comments?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Petitions

Meeting date: 11 March 2025

Ariane Burgess

Does anyone else have comments?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Petitions

Meeting date: 11 March 2025

Ariane Burgess

We could certainly look for opportunities to do that as part of our pre-budget scrutiny in the coming year.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Petitions

Meeting date: 11 March 2025

Ariane Burgess

Now is the moment to decide as a group what we want to do with it. Having heard what people have said, my sense, and what I understand from the Citizens Participation and Public Petitions Committee, is that we do not have to keep a petition open in order to consider the issues that it raises. A petition is almost like a rocket launcher; it is a catalyst for us to look at things. As colleagues have said, we all have experience across our constituencies and regions of those types of issues.

We could certainly look for an opportunity to do some work that could be of value, possibly as part of our pre-budget scrutiny process. We could communicate our appreciation for the trade unions—Unite, GMB and Unison—that jointly raised the petition and brought the issues to our attention. My sense is that there is a general inclination to close the petition and to commit to picking up a piece of work that would look at leisure facilities as well as other venues that people use more widely.

Do members agree to our taking that approach?

Members indicated agreement.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 March 2025

Ariane Burgess

The next item of business is consideration of five negative instruments.

As members have no comments to make, does the committee agree that we do not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the instruments?

Members indicated agreement.

11:11 Meeting continued in private until 11:59.  

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Petitions

Meeting date: 11 March 2025

Ariane Burgess

The next petition that is under consideration is PE1778, on reviewing the effectiveness of the Scottish landlord register scheme. Do members have any comments on the petition?

11:00