The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4994 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
It was on headage, which you covered, convener.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Could we build on the back of anything that currently exists in tracking farming activities, or would it need to be something new?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Vera, you talked about carbon pricing signals. Can you elaborate on that a bit more?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
That is helpful. If you would send on that detail, that would be great.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
It would be good to understand that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
I want to pick up on a few points. In the Parliament, we hear quite a bit about co-design from the Government. This may just be a comment, but we hear “co-design” and then we hear “dissatisfaction”, not just on this committee or on this particular issue. Before I got this job, I used to do design thinking. Is something in the co-design process causing that dissatisfaction? Is there a process that is clearly laid out for the people that you are working with? The double diamond process is an example of a model that gets used a lot. Do people really understand the process that you are taking them through?
Another point is that people are burnt out with consultation. We have heard from colleagues elsewhere that people do not feel as if they are really being heard. It goes beyond being listened to. It is one thing to be listened to, but it is another thing to be heard—you see that there is an outcome because somebody has heard what you have to say.
There is something interesting in there about process, and it leads on to my next point. Last night, the cross-party group on crofting met. The suckler beef SSI came up again as a concern, as well as general concern about the design and roll-out of the system. SSIs are coming—potentially, they will be coming thick and fast; we are not sure—and we do not have a lot of time to scrutinise them.
Minister, it was good to hear that you have visited crofters and built those connections and relationships. I want to get a sense that you are working with crofters, and other farmers before the committee even sees the SSIs—“behind the curtain”, as I would put it—so that people have time to contribute to the co-design in a genuine way. Last night, quite a bit of concern was expressed about that in relation to crofters’ experience.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
I understand that it is not easy, but I am also a bit concerned about the fact that that is all in your thinking—I hope that it has been disseminated across your team.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
The last topic is knowledge transfer and capacity building. Mike Robinson said that education is the biggest skills deficit in every sector. David McKay talked about peer-to-peer learning and the tiny amount of money for that in tier 4, which needs to be increased. Dave Reay also talked about that.
The 2020 update to the climate change plan talks about all the different things that the Government is focusing on, such as communication methods, using technology and media to best effect, how to get the information over and how to build capacity in farmers. We have talked about peer-to-peer knowledge transfer and David McKay talked about farmer-led clusters. What mechanisms should be used to facilitate knowledge transfer between research institutions, policy makers and the farming community to meet the climate and adaptation goals? I am asking not necessarily about farmer-to-farmer knowledge transfer but about how we get what Vera Eory has talked about all morning to farmers through policy makers.
12:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
I am glad that Dave Reay mentioned the RLUPs, because I have a note that I took earlier in the conversation that says “Working at scale?” I have a good and constructive RLUP in the north-west and one thing that comes up when I talk to it is the need for what I call soft infrastructure, by which I mean something that is Government-funded that involves people who have the skills to convene the large-scale landscape groups. What do you think about that idea for speeding up the process? I hear your frustration on the RLUPs, but do we need to have that infrastructure of people who are not managing the land but who have the skills to project manage and bring everyone together?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Specifically on the issue of getting crofters behind the curtain and co-designing—