The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 671 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
Are there any specific flaws that the witnesses wish to identify in the safeguards against coercion that are set out in the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
I go back to the question that I asked about a whole-family assessment. Do you believe that such an assessment should be done?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
Yes.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
They are worried that the potential for coercion has become such a big issue that people might think that all disabled people are being coerced into opting for an assisted death. If they decide that they want an assisted death, they want their feelings to be taken seriously, on their merits.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
We should not be consenting to the SI for a number of reasons. The divergence from alignment with the EU, as I outlined in my questions to the minister, is a big concern. As Brian Whittle said in his questioning, the only piece that we seem to be removing from the puzzle is the 10-year re-authorisation. At the moment, those come to the Parliament as SSIs. Removing that process would remove parliamentary scrutiny of whether we want those chemicals to have another round of 10-year authorisation and whether we want them in our food environment. Taking that power away from the Parliament would be regrettable. We would also, potentially, not see the authorisations for new feeds coming to the Parliament. On that basis, we should not be consenting to the SI.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
To what extent do the witnesses acknowledge the feeling of being a burden as an example of potential coercion, as defined in the bill, and the risk of such feelings being internalised coercion for some who might consider an assisted death?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
I have nothing to declare.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 16 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
Mr Adam has, unknowingly, teed me up nicely for my questions. Paisley is a good example of a place where cultural venues are located along its high street. However, that is not the norm across a lot of the country. Across my region, we have seen the closure of town halls. Motherwell concert hall is closed because of reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete within it, and it is very unlikely that it will reopen without major investment, which the local authority is not able to make.
Many local authorities offload cultural venues to make budgetary cuts across the piece. It is great that there is the Ravenscraig regional sports facility in North Lanarkshire, but that is not the same as having an accessible concert hall in the middle of the community in Motherwell.
The accessibility of culture is something that we need to consider. It is great to have the museums in Edinburgh and Glasgow that people are able to visit for free, but getting to Edinburgh and Glasgow is very expensive and time consuming for many people.
I know that the cabinet secretary touched on this earlier, but what other conversations can be held with, and what support can be given to, local authorities to ensure that we do not lose many important venues for smaller-scale cultural performances or whatever? If we lose those venues, the likelihood of their coming back and being there for future generations—and for future budgets to provide support to—is quite low.