The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 671 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
That is great. Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
I will let you choose.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
Other than the revised wording, in what ways do you think the national performance framework can better integrate mental health services in broader public policy to ensure long-term improvements in mental health services and preventative care?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
That is great. Thank you. Prevention is the other aspect that I wanted to pick up on, because commercial determinants of health are not really referenced at all within the NPF but, as we know, they have a massive impact on people’s wellbeing.
Emma Congreve touched on things not speaking to each other across the whole piece. How can we track and tackle some of those commercial determinants of health within the updated health outcome to make sure that we take a broader environmental view of the landscape to make sure that what is done has the impact that we need it to have?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
What are the witnesses’ views on the proposed revision to the health outcome? To what extent is the proposal appropriate in placing a renewed emphasis on mental health and physical activity?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
Absolutely. From the previous panel of witnesses, we heard concerns about the siloed nature of the NPF and the need for links between the portfolios in order to have good outcomes as a whole. Does more need to be done on the links between, for example, fair work and health and the determinants that they have in relation to each other, to ensure that the NPF can realise its aims?
I will go to Carol Calder, as she is nodding.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
Prevention is another aspect that the NPF notes but does not have a lot of detail underneath it as to how we actually get there with policy. I am particularly interested in the commercial determinants of health and in health-harming products. Does there need to be a broader emphasis in the NPF about the factors that influence public health? If so, what strategies could we put in place or embed underneath the national performance framework to ensure that we address those commercial determinants of health?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
That was great. Thanks.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
Given the whole range of priorities, frameworks, performance metrics and all those things for IJBs, with limited resource, how can we support IJBs in collecting the good and useful data that can drive some of those outcomes? IJBs have so many performance and measurement frameworks that they legally have to report on, while, as a whole system, we are trying to drive better data, but there are only so many people to do all that work.
10:00Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2024
Gillian Mackay
With the previous panel, we heard about local improvement support team—LIST—analysts in IJBs. Do your IJBs have those posts? What value do they add to the IJBs? What other measures could be put in place to support IJBs with data gathering, given the range of performance management frameworks to which the IJBs have to contribute? How do we get the shift to recording the right things for integration across the piece?
Given what Pat Togher said about different IJBs having different things in place, how do we ensure that we do not overcomplicate the picture for the IJBs that may or may not have some of those things delegated to them?