The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 319 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you, Gail. I think that Martin Booth wants to come in.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Meghan Gallacher
I have a question for Kate Forbes. Council leaders have written to the First Minister to request a meeting to discuss the budget settlement. As we heard from Councillor Gail Macgregor, the First Minister has declined that request. If the Scottish Government is confident in its defence of the local government settlement, why has the First Minister declined such a meeting with council leaders?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)
Meeting date: 11 January 2022
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Meghan Gallacher
Andrew Mitchell has indicated that he wants to come in. After that, I will move on to my next question.
10:30Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Meghan Gallacher
Like Elena Whitham, I refer to my entry in the register of members’ interests. I am a serving councillor in North Lanarkshire Council.
Last week, we heard from witnesses who raised concerns about the cost of a short-term let licence. How much would the panel members expect a three-year short-term let licence to cost? Do they believe that the cost could harm small businesses and their ability to function?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you for your contributions. Do any of the witnesses have concerns about the inclusion of traditional bed and breakfast accommodation in the definition of a short-term let? Can you provide reassurances to those who own such accommodation?
This time round, I will start with Andrew Mitchell.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Meghan Gallacher
Tony Cain and Leon Thompson want to come in—I am not quite sure in which order, because I cannot see what is in the chat function.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Meghan Gallacher
I see that Ailsa Raeburn is also looking to come in.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Meghan Gallacher
I do not have much to add to the debate, but I will touch on one or two points that colleagues made.
I reiterate the point that I am absolutely not scaremongering. The concerns are legitimate. We need to weigh up risks and I am not convinced that the regulations would eliminate the risks that we have spoken about.
Stephanie Callaghan mentioned an assertion that it was all about serious offences. That is not what I said and I think that she has picked me up wrongly. I said that there was a wide-ranging list of offences. That is where another concern comes in. It could be something minimal or it could be something more serious. It is a matter of weighing up what would be approved and what would not be approved. We need to have more discussions about that instead of approving the legislation as is.
I want to touch on the barred list. I understand James Dornan’s point. However, as we heard earlier, 13 out of the 19 applications were successful. That shows that there is a sway in respect of applications being approved. That is okay if they have gone through robust processes, but it adds a further element of risk.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Meghan Gallacher
I will move the motion on behalf of Oliver Mundell.
Currently, those aged 18 to 25 who wish to apply to be removed from the children’s or adults’ list, as set out in the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007, can apply to do so after 10 years. Individuals who are on the lists are on there because it has been decided by ministers that it would be inappropriate for them to work with children or vulnerable adults. Reasons for referral can include engaging in child sex offences, among other things.
The regulations would lower the threshold by five years for 18 to 25-year-olds, meaning that they could apply to be removed from the children’s or adults’ list five years after being placed on it. That is concerning, because it might allow people who have been identified as harmful to children to work with children sooner as they could reoffend and then reapply to be removed from the list within five years instead of 10. That might also reduce competence in the disclosure system if the individual who was on the children’s or adults’ list has been removed.
There are also concerns about victims who might feel that the Scottish Government is favouring the perpetrator. What happens if they are living in the same community? There could also be wider issues there.
As has been discussed this morning, the sorts of offences and cases involved are too wide. That would need to be looked into further for the regulations to be approved. There are also concerns about the five-year limit and the overall justification for amending the regulations today. Moving the limit is a serious cause of concern and it should not be done, for the reasons that I have listed today and for the other reasons that members have raised.
I move,
That the Education, Children and Young People Committee recommends that the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007 (Applications for Removal from List and Late Representations) Amendment Regulations 2021 be annulled.—[Meghan Gallacher]