Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 19 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 319 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)

Budget Scrutiny 2022-23

Meeting date: 11 January 2022

Meghan Gallacher

Thank you, Gail. I think that Martin Booth wants to come in.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)

Budget Scrutiny 2022-23

Meeting date: 11 January 2022

Meghan Gallacher

I have a question for Kate Forbes. Council leaders have written to the First Minister to request a meeting to discuss the budget settlement. As we heard from Councillor Gail Macgregor, the First Minister has declined that request. If the Scottish Government is confident in its defence of the local government settlement, why has the First Minister declined such a meeting with council leaders?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee (Virtual)

Budget Scrutiny 2022-23

Meeting date: 11 January 2022

Meghan Gallacher

Thank you.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 14 December 2021

Meghan Gallacher

Andrew Mitchell has indicated that he wants to come in. After that, I will move on to my next question.

10:30  

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 14 December 2021

Meghan Gallacher

Like Elena Whitham, I refer to my entry in the register of members’ interests. I am a serving councillor in North Lanarkshire Council.

Last week, we heard from witnesses who raised concerns about the cost of a short-term let licence. How much would the panel members expect a three-year short-term let licence to cost? Do they believe that the cost could harm small businesses and their ability to function?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 14 December 2021

Meghan Gallacher

Thank you for your contributions. Do any of the witnesses have concerns about the inclusion of traditional bed and breakfast accommodation in the definition of a short-term let? Can you provide reassurances to those who own such accommodation?

This time round, I will start with Andrew Mitchell.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 14 December 2021

Meghan Gallacher

Tony Cain and Leon Thompson want to come in—I am not quite sure in which order, because I cannot see what is in the chat function.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 14 December 2021

Meghan Gallacher

I see that Ailsa Raeburn is also looking to come in.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 8 December 2021

Meghan Gallacher

I do not have much to add to the debate, but I will touch on one or two points that colleagues made.

I reiterate the point that I am absolutely not scaremongering. The concerns are legitimate. We need to weigh up risks and I am not convinced that the regulations would eliminate the risks that we have spoken about.

Stephanie Callaghan mentioned an assertion that it was all about serious offences. That is not what I said and I think that she has picked me up wrongly. I said that there was a wide-ranging list of offences. That is where another concern comes in. It could be something minimal or it could be something more serious. It is a matter of weighing up what would be approved and what would not be approved. We need to have more discussions about that instead of approving the legislation as is.

I want to touch on the barred list. I understand James Dornan’s point. However, as we heard earlier, 13 out of the 19 applications were successful. That shows that there is a sway in respect of applications being approved. That is okay if they have gone through robust processes, but it adds a further element of risk.

Education, Children and Young People Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 8 December 2021

Meghan Gallacher

I will move the motion on behalf of Oliver Mundell.

Currently, those aged 18 to 25 who wish to apply to be removed from the children’s or adults’ list, as set out in the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007, can apply to do so after 10 years. Individuals who are on the lists are on there because it has been decided by ministers that it would be inappropriate for them to work with children or vulnerable adults. Reasons for referral can include engaging in child sex offences, among other things.

The regulations would lower the threshold by five years for 18 to 25-year-olds, meaning that they could apply to be removed from the children’s or adults’ list five years after being placed on it. That is concerning, because it might allow people who have been identified as harmful to children to work with children sooner as they could reoffend and then reapply to be removed from the list within five years instead of 10. That might also reduce competence in the disclosure system if the individual who was on the children’s or adults’ list has been removed.

There are also concerns about victims who might feel that the Scottish Government is favouring the perpetrator. What happens if they are living in the same community? There could also be wider issues there.

As has been discussed this morning, the sorts of offences and cases involved are too wide. That would need to be looked into further for the regulations to be approved. There are also concerns about the five-year limit and the overall justification for amending the regulations today. Moving the limit is a serious cause of concern and it should not be done, for the reasons that I have listed today and for the other reasons that members have raised.

I move,

That the Education, Children and Young People Committee recommends that the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007 (Applications for Removal from List and Late Representations) Amendment Regulations 2021 be annulled.—[Meghan Gallacher]