The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 319 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
That appears to have been a serious overlooked element in this case, because I do not understand how that particular item could be placed in a budget and risk assessment if it was not going to be used for a particular purpose.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Good morning to the committee, the minister and Gillian Mackay.
We have had quite a bit of conversation about signage and I was grateful for the opportunity to meet the minister and Gillian Mackay to talk about that issue. The intent of amendment 51 is to ensure that safe access zones for protected premises are clearly marked and to summarise the restrictions that will apply by virtue of the act within the safe access zones. I understand that the reasons for not including signage in the initial draft of the bill were about protecting women and not drawing close attention to where buffer zones are. However, I still have some concerns about the understanding of where a buffer zone will begin within the 200-mile radius—sorry, I mean 200 metres. Signage would enable clear distinctions of buffer zones, which would allow people to understand where a zone will begin and will not begin. I stress again that it is 200 metres and not 200 miles.
I understand that health boards may install signage in their areas if they wish. However, with amendment 51, I want to probe the matter further to allow a more open debate. I understand that the committee did a lot of work on the issue, but I would like to get more understanding from the minister of whether we could look at it further.
I move amendment 51.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
I am grateful, convener, for allowing me the time to come back in.
I want to reflect on amendment 56 in the name of my colleague Rachael Hamilton and amendment 57 in my name. They are important amendments on deterrence, prevention and adding an additional layer of protection for vulnerable women seeking to access those healthcare services.
On the slight differences between the two amendments, it is good that they are different, as they bring in not only the element of filming but that of recording. The reason for lodging those amendments is that, with the consistent evolution of social media and the different ways in which they could find themselves being harassed by certain groups in the future, women could end up finding images online of themselves accessing those services, because groups are no longer able to stand outwith the healthcare clinics.
Certainly, my reason for lodging amendment 57 was to provide that additional layer of protection. If the opportunity is open, I would be grateful to work with anyone who is seeking to add any additional layers of protection for vulnerable women. I would be grateful for the minister’s comments on that, as I believe that Rachael Hamilton’s amendment and my amendment would bring an important additional element to the bill.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
My amendment 52 would give ministers the power to
“specify protected premises for the purposes of the offence under subsection (1).”
That would represent an added layer of protection in relation to any legal challenge that could be brought in the future. That is the reason—it is short and sweet—for my amendment.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Given that amendment 52 was disagreed to, I will not move amendment 53.
Amendment 53 not moved.
Amendments 20, 54, 55 and 21 not moved.
Section 5 agreed to.
After section 5
Amendments 56 and 57 not moved.
Section 6—Exceptions to offences
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
I have listened carefully to all the points that have been raised. I am sure that my colleague Tess White and I will be happy to work with Gillian Mackay and the minister on that really important issue. I take into consideration that we do not want women to feel harassed and we do not want to create future gathering points for protest groups outside premises. However, ahead of stage 3, we need to tease out more of the legality issues that Dr Sandesh Gulhane raised. I welcome that opportunity, so I will not press amendment 51.
Amendment 51, by agreement, withdrawn.
Section 4—Offence of influencing, preventing access or causing harassment etc in safe access zone
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Minister, you used the word “likely”. There is a risk, then, as there would be some exceptions; in other words, some things might not fall into what would be deemed as an offence under the section in question. Have you carried out any further work on the parameters for breaching or getting away with the offence?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
My final question is in relation to insurance bills. Is there a risk that insurance bills—for example, premiums for motorists and other premiums—could increase as a result of this decision? Could it have an impact on the wider public?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Would it be appropriate for us to fall in line with the additional information that the Northern Ireland Executive is seeking and, perhaps, to ask for more information on the matter before proceeding?