The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 319 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Meghan Gallacher
From reading the submissions and from feedback that I have had from the disabled community and disability charities, I know that people cannot wait. Action is required now if they are to feel valued and part of something wider that protects them and which encompasses their rights. That is where the buffer is, and there have been explanations as to what could be done to enhance their rights. Do the witnesses support the creation of, for example, a learning disabilities, autism and neurodivergence commissioner?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 June 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Good morning, panel. I have listened with interest so far to what you have said about the potential introduction of a disability commissioner. In its submission, the Glasgow Disability Alliance—one of the largest disability organisations in Europe, with more than 5,000 members—has said:
“Despite knowing about the work, especially, of the Scottish Human Rights Commission ... and the Equality and Human Rights Commission ... the consensus is that now, more than ever, Scotland needs a Disability Commissioner whose sole focus is on disabled people”.
We know that organisations have had powers, and we have spoken this morning about potential extensions of powers to make a difference, but it is clear that disabled people still feel disadvantaged and as though they are at the back of the line when it comes to knowing and exercising their rights. How will that change if we do not have a disability commissioner? Jan Savage, can I start with you?
10:30Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
You also mentioned the genital contact aspect. As part of the many articles that have been written about the application in recent times, several interviews have been conducted, including with intimacy co-ordinators. One intimacy co-ordinator says that all genital contact falls within the definition of non-simulated sex. Sex with genital contact was mentioned in phase 2 of the research and development aspect of the application. Do you agree with that statement from the intimacy co-ordinator who was interviewed? If not, what evidence do you have for the contrary position?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
That brings me to the guidance and the strategic framework that applications are measured against before they are approved. Who signs off the strategic framework for applications to be approved? Who creates the guidance and the strategic framework?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
No, I am just—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Good morning, gentlemen. I do not think that anyone doubts the work of Creative Scotland or the artists that it supports. We fully understand the budget constraints that you are working within and I sincerely sympathise with you in that regard. I understand how tough that must be, particularly given the number of artists that you want to support and the fact that you receive so many applications. However, we have this application issue in front of us and serious questions need to be asked about the handling of the application and how best to move forward with Creative Scotland.
It has already been mentioned this morning that the funding application stated that, in the second phase of research and development, the applicant would be working on
“a sex scene with genital contact”.
We have also heard this morning that the budget and risk assessment included STI tests, but also lubricant. You have spoken about the STI tests with regard to safeguarding, but surely you would assume that the use of lubricant would mean that the scene would go much further than simulated sex and that it would move into non-simulated sex. Why were questions not asked about that part?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Okay, but it was mentioned in phase 2 of the research and development.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Up to this point, throughout the history of applications being processed and approved, have any concerns ever been raised about that framework or the guidance?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
I will ask one final question, if I may, convener.
I understand what you have said this morning. However, the problem is that we have here two different assessments as to what has happened. We have the assessment from Creative Scotland and we have the assessment from the project itself, and there are contradictions throughout regarding the application process and whether the decision and the outcome of removing the funding from the application was disputed. I therefore need to ask a direct question. Those assessments cannot both be correct, so which one is correct?
09:45Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Given what has happened, are there now intentions between Creative Scotland and the Scottish Government to re-look at this? I know that you said that you are strengthening the guidance and the framework, but is there an overall strategy that will need to be re-looked at in order to restore public confidence, given what has happened?