Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 20 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 319 contributions

|

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Disability Commissioner (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 June 2024

Meghan Gallacher

From reading the submissions and from feedback that I have had from the disabled community and disability charities, I know that people cannot wait. Action is required now if they are to feel valued and part of something wider that protects them and which encompasses their rights. That is where the buffer is, and there have been explanations as to what could be done to enhance their rights. Do the witnesses support the creation of, for example, a learning disabilities, autism and neurodivergence commissioner?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee

Disability Commissioner (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 4 June 2024

Meghan Gallacher

Good morning, panel. I have listened with interest so far to what you have said about the potential introduction of a disability commissioner. In its submission, the Glasgow Disability Alliance—one of the largest disability organisations in Europe, with more than 5,000 members—has said:

“Despite knowing about the work, especially, of the Scottish Human Rights Commission ... and the Equality and Human Rights Commission ... the consensus is that now, more than ever, Scotland needs a Disability Commissioner whose sole focus is on disabled people”.

We know that organisations have had powers, and we have spoken this morning about potential extensions of powers to make a difference, but it is clear that disabled people still feel disadvantaged and as though they are at the back of the line when it comes to knowing and exercising their rights. How will that change if we do not have a disability commissioner? Jan Savage, can I start with you?

10:30  

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Creative Scotland (Funding for Rein)

Meeting date: 30 May 2024

Meghan Gallacher

You also mentioned the genital contact aspect. As part of the many articles that have been written about the application in recent times, several interviews have been conducted, including with intimacy co-ordinators. One intimacy co-ordinator says that all genital contact falls within the definition of non-simulated sex. Sex with genital contact was mentioned in phase 2 of the research and development aspect of the application. Do you agree with that statement from the intimacy co-ordinator who was interviewed? If not, what evidence do you have for the contrary position?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Creative Scotland (Funding for Rein)

Meeting date: 30 May 2024

Meghan Gallacher

That brings me to the guidance and the strategic framework that applications are measured against before they are approved. Who signs off the strategic framework for applications to be approved? Who creates the guidance and the strategic framework?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Creative Scotland (Funding for Rein)

Meeting date: 30 May 2024

Meghan Gallacher

No, I am just—

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Creative Scotland (Funding for Rein)

Meeting date: 30 May 2024

Meghan Gallacher

Good morning, gentlemen. I do not think that anyone doubts the work of Creative Scotland or the artists that it supports. We fully understand the budget constraints that you are working within and I sincerely sympathise with you in that regard. I understand how tough that must be, particularly given the number of artists that you want to support and the fact that you receive so many applications. However, we have this application issue in front of us and serious questions need to be asked about the handling of the application and how best to move forward with Creative Scotland.

It has already been mentioned this morning that the funding application stated that, in the second phase of research and development, the applicant would be working on

“a sex scene with genital contact”.

We have also heard this morning that the budget and risk assessment included STI tests, but also lubricant. You have spoken about the STI tests with regard to safeguarding, but surely you would assume that the use of lubricant would mean that the scene would go much further than simulated sex and that it would move into non-simulated sex. Why were questions not asked about that part?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Creative Scotland (Funding for Rein)

Meeting date: 30 May 2024

Meghan Gallacher

Okay, but it was mentioned in phase 2 of the research and development.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Creative Scotland (Funding for Rein)

Meeting date: 30 May 2024

Meghan Gallacher

Up to this point, throughout the history of applications being processed and approved, have any concerns ever been raised about that framework or the guidance?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Creative Scotland (Funding for Rein)

Meeting date: 30 May 2024

Meghan Gallacher

I will ask one final question, if I may, convener.

I understand what you have said this morning. However, the problem is that we have here two different assessments as to what has happened. We have the assessment from Creative Scotland and we have the assessment from the project itself, and there are contradictions throughout regarding the application process and whether the decision and the outcome of removing the funding from the application was disputed. I therefore need to ask a direct question. Those assessments cannot both be correct, so which one is correct?

09:45  

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Creative Scotland (Funding for Rein)

Meeting date: 30 May 2024

Meghan Gallacher

Given what has happened, are there now intentions between Creative Scotland and the Scottish Government to re-look at this? I know that you said that you are strengthening the guidance and the framework, but is there an overall strategy that will need to be re-looked at in order to restore public confidence, given what has happened?