The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2186 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Stephen Kerr
Yes—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Stephen Kerr
When you say that the number was “significantly lower”, do you have a metric to go with that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Stephen Kerr
It is just all interesting information. It is very important that people do not feel put off voting because they have to show voter ID.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Stephen Kerr
It is not necessarily the stuff that carries an imprint that is the problem, though, is it? The purveyors of deepfakery will not be in the business of putting on imprints. The concern is that AI can be used not necessarily by good actors—rather, by very bad actors. There are quite a few of them online, and they certainly are not limited to the geography of the United Kingdom.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Stephen Kerr
Short money should obviously not be used for that kind of party political purpose.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Stephen Kerr
Yes, it is short. Andy O'Neill, what are you going to do about the alphabet? You know what I am talking about, right?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Stephen Kerr
The biggest concern for me personally is the completeness and accuracy of the registers. There are lots of stand-out questions on that, particularly about Scotland. For context for those who are watching, I will share something on completeness. A report that you have produced shows that the major errors total in Scotland in 2022 was 18.5 per cent, which was up from 16.5 per cent in 2018. What the watching public might be interested in is the comparison with Great Britain, where the figure is at 13.4 per cent for major errors—we are at 18.5 per cent. That obviously requires explanation. On minor errors—again for context—the number in Scotland is 13.4 per cent, and across Great Britain it is 8.6 per cent.
Something different is happening in Scotland and it seems to be getting worse over time. Why?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Stephen Kerr
Do we have a particular challenge in getting any specific group to come on to the register? We have not even begun to talk about accuracy yet—we seem to have a specific challenge with that as well. I take Craig Westwood’s point about not reading too much into one data set, but that is the data that we have. What groups do we have to work particularly hard with to get to the register?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Stephen Kerr
What is the Scottish dimension to all of that, particularly the attitudinal stuff?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2023
Stephen Kerr
Ivan has just prompted a question in my head about—