The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3402 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
I understand that their aspirations will be for their shareholdings to retain their value, if not for that value to increase. However, they have just seen their holdings depreciate by 50 per cent in a year. Surely, they are saying much more than that to your executive team. Are they expressing confidence in you?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
Where does the figure of £3 million come from? What is the basis for it?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
But nothing quite like what will happen with STV North. You are effectively surrendering that licence, are you not?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
Yes, in effect, STV is giving up the licence.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
You have met the leadership team in Glasgow.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
Right, okay.
Many other questions need to be asked, not least about the facts that you are spending money on a radio station, hiring expensive presenters and investing in infrastructure for the studio. You have just spent £500,000 on refurbishing your Aberdeen and Glasgow studios, but the Aberdeen one will now fall into disuse.
I think that you have lots of questions to answer, but time does not permit me to put them just now. I will pass back to the convener.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
Yes, I accept the fact that there have been formal meetings, but, when we visited London recently, we heard evidence from a UK Government minister about how good the relationship was now after the reset between the UK and Scottish Governments. He told us that he was out with a UK minister—I do not know whether I am allowed to say their names. Am I?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
Sometimes you have to force people together. It suits some politicians not to speak to each other and to just shout at each other through the broadcast and other media. Does the idea that there will be a meeting and that, therefore, preparatory work needs to be done, and then post-meeting communiqués and so on must be produced, mean that, even when people do not like each other—when the chemistry is not good and the culture is not right—they still have to meet and speak?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
I have two more questions, convener, and then other colleagues will want to come in. Then, if there is time, I will have 100 more questions, at least.
My first question is about the idea of having joint scrutiny, which Keith Brown alluded to. I am a strong believer in the idea that we should co-operate across Parliaments, because we have so many areas of joint interest. Where else in the world does joint scrutiny happen? Where else in the world would members of a House of Commons select committee, a Scottish Parliament committee, a Senedd committee and perhaps a Stormont committee come together to do a joint inquiry? Does that happen? How successful is it? How does it work?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
Does anyone else have any experience or knowledge of these things?
We have discussed it as a committee, and we have met with members of committees of the House of Commons and the House of Lords because the scope for co-ordinated inquiries—let us call them that, if not joint inquiries—is great. One challenge that we have had here has been getting UK ministers to come and speak to committees with the regularity that we would like. Joint approaches might work better, because, constitutionally, ministers are responsible only to the Parliament that they sit in—I understand that. It would be helpful if there was a broader approach.
My second question is to do with the EU-UK reset, which could be another mythical creature for all I know. I am wondering about the consequences of agreements, particularly for the food and drink aspects of any reset. I do not know how near we are to having some agreement with the European Union, but undoubtedly one of the demands of the European Union will be that we operate in lockstep with its regulations. Setting aside the issue of whether we should be in lockstep at all, I am interested in the consequences for this Parliament of that arrangement, because, based on the reports that we get of the volume of regulation that would come our way, we would struggle to do anything other than just nod at its coming and going. There would be no scrutiny whatsoever.
Can I have some commentary from those of you who have a view on it about the consequences of a lockstep regulatory agreement between the UK and the European Union for scrutiny, accountability and democracy?