The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2155 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
I would like Angus Robertson to write to explain why the Scottish Government has done nothing.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
You have not—you have just gone on to a politically inspired description. I would really like to know how the Welsh Government, with a much smaller budget and a smaller population, can commit £65 million to Taith, which has involved 15,000 young people from Wales participating in exchanges and 10,000 international participants coming to Wales, while the Scottish Government has spent a grand total of £2 million in two years, which is £1 million a year, and to focus on what? We do not even know how many young people have been involved with SEEP. Why has the Scottish Government not even bothered at all? Angus Robertson passionately believes in youth mobility.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
They have.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
That is very generous of you, convener. It is an unexpected opportunity. This question requires only a yes or no answer, which will please the cabinet secretary. Does he welcome the UK youth mobility visa, as it stands, being extended to all EU nations as a step towards improving the youth mobility that he spoke about?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
It already exists and operates on a bilateral basis with a number of countries.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
We have looked at one of the issues that you mentioned, which is mutual recognition of qualifications. We have had interesting evidence from a number of people—I have no doubt that they are experts in their fields—including Professor Catherine Barnard of the University of Cambridge. From my professional experience, I can vouch that what she told us is true. She said that
“even when we were in the EU, the mutual recognition provisions did not work terribly well, because there is a lot of vested interest in each state to ensure that its people get the jobs and professions and that those are not very open to other people. The legal profession is a good example of that.”—[Official Report, Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee, 21 November 2024; c 16.]
We have that problem even in the UK, because of the different jurisdictions in Scotland and England.
I agree with the cabinet secretary that we want to smooth out any rough edges of free trade, and I am all for free trade, as he well knows. Does he accept that the issue was a problem before the UK left the EU and that, regardless of whether we are in the EU, a lot of work therefore needs to be done to push forward bilateral recognition of professional qualifications?
We were given the example of architects. Architects in the United Kingdom and those in the European Union agreed that they would accept each other’s qualifications, which is fair and good, and then the European Union said no.
10:30Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
Where to begin? Can we, first of all, ascertain the view of not just the cabinet secretary, but perhaps especially of Dr Frank Möschler, who I think is in Brussels? Has the Windsor framework agreement made a difference to the tone of the way that things are happening between the UK Government and the European Union in Brussels, in particular the institutions in Brussels?
I had the opportunity to visit one of our world-class research centres in Scotland this week, and I was heartened to hear from it that, since the Windsor framework agreement, there has been an almost complete change of atmosphere around research funding, project lead status and so forth. I ask you to respond first, cabinet secretary, but I would like to hear from Dr Möschler as well.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
It sounds as though it is a bit of a nightmare for touring artists to go just about anywhere at the moment. That is my conclusion from what you have all said, which has been pretty comprehensive.
I turn back to Lisa Whytock, who started off by giving a really full picture of the evidence. Do artists qualify for any form of export support other than the fund that you mentioned that the UK Government offered, which you said that you thought was biased towards London-based artists? Are there any other forms of export support?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
In your paper, you say something very interesting, which is kind of tangential to what we are talking about, about the word “reset”. We have been using that word a lot—in fact, the UK Labour Government has been using it as well—and it obviously carries a lot of heavy meaning. However, you clearly say:
“The term ‘reset’ is ill-defined and widely rejected in EU circles.”
Do talk a bit more about that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
Okay, that is very interesting.
You said that the UK had a role to play in the emergence of some kind of regulatory framework around the application of AI, or perhaps—to follow Patrick Harvie’s line of reasoning—in how people interact with it and utilise it. What role does the UK play in that? We are between the United States, which has one dominant philosophy in almost every area of human activity, and the EU, which is at the other end of the scale. Where does the UK fit in and what is the role that you described?