The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2186 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Stephen Kerr
I would like to talk a bit more about the strategy that is included in the report. At the beginning of the report, you refer to your top objective. It is quite difficult to read—it might be my age—because it is in black text on a green background. The report states:
“We will operate an effective complaints system”.
It goes on to say a little about what that means, but will you expand on what you see as an effective complaints system? How would you define that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Stephen Kerr
We have the numbers from the report, and you are right that the report that we are working from is dated. You have been hard at work on that and are making progress.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Stephen Kerr
I have some more questions, but I—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Stephen Kerr
Your bringing your good office and your presence to bear in respect of stakeholder confidence is all good, but—you can correct me if I am wrong here—I reckon that those issues were listed in order of importance to you as the commissioner, and number 1 was “Loss of stakeholder confidence”.
Going beyond that, I take your point that none of us is very backwards in coming forward with our points of view and so on, but it would be terribly useful if there was a regular survey—one that was carried out every two years, say—that brought you data sets on confidence levels that you could measure and plot in an organised way. That is rightly identified as a critical issue for the success of your role and your office, so it is worthy of being measured. Do you have any comment to make on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Stephen Kerr
Oh, gosh. I thought that I had read it properly.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Stephen Kerr
Do you mean “visible” as in apparent characteristics?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Stephen Kerr
Specific targets have been set for diversity by what I am calling protected characteristics, but I did not read about any particular drive to ensure that the people who are appointed come from diverse backgrounds in terms of their household incomes and work experience. It is possible that I may have missed that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Stephen Kerr
You have brought the necessary discipline for any organisation—public or private—of planning.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Stephen Kerr
There are 100 appointments a year, on average, so we might see some progress.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 14 March 2024
Stephen Kerr
I agree. A few more people, particularly with private or voluntary sector backgrounds, need to be nudged to make themselves available, because—you are absolutely right—they might not see themselves in that sort of role and yet their experience, if they are not there, is a critical missing piece.