The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3374 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
From what you have just said, I take it that the Scottish Government knew that fisheries were part of the set of negotiating cards that the UK Government was playing with the EU.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
And you knew nothing about the 2038 deal, which was apparently struck in the morning.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
It is a political issue, and it will be resolved—as these matters are—by people voting. We have an election very shortly, and it is up to Angus Robertson, Keith Brown and the other nationalists on the committee and in the Parliament to make the case for that. I think you will find—and some of you are honest enough in your hearts to know this—that the vast majority of people in Scotland have more pressing considerations and priorities, and that will shape how people vote.
However, this is a question of politics. Constitutional arrangements are very clear. The law is very clear. The issue should be determined—as you have said and as we would say—as a matter of democratic process. That is how it has been done in the past in this country, and that is how it will be done in future.
Frankly, the whole inquiry has been a fractious waste of time, because what we have heard in evidence time and again is what we already knew, which is that the Supreme Court judgment makes it clear that the powers rest with the sovereign Parliament of the United Kingdom. The evidence that we have received from many of the experts is also stacked heavily in the corner of those who say that the country has a very liberal and flexible constitutional arrangement, and the evidence of the past proves that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
Well, the experts—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
No, it was a precursor.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
You can call those IGR meetings.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
Yes. There is no structure or schedule of meetings. It is not like the Council of Ministers in the European Union.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
But they are not held that way, are they? We have data that shows that some of the meetings are pretty regular, in that some of them are held once every four months, but some of them are held once a year and some of them are not held at all.
The advantage of an independent secretariat would be that, in the same way as we get with the EU Council of Ministers, it would create a regularity, an independent setting, an independent agenda and all of the stuff that the Scottish Government does not have. I would have thought that you would be in favour of that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
I accept that the structure is not the be all and end all; we are interested in the outcomes. However, I put it to you that, from a Scottish Government point of view, it would be useful if the process had an independent heartbeat rather than it being so ad hoc. I know that ad hocery is the British way of doing things, but that sometimes creates spaces and gaps that cause their own issues.
That is why I have fixated this morning on the need for an independent secretariat that has the shared authority of the UK Government and the devolved Administrations to make everything happen. At the moment, we do not have transparency, we do not have agendas, we do not have minutes, and we do not have communiqués. There needs to be a mechanism that is independent of the Governments that creates that transparency and accountability that does not exist for us as parliamentarians. Do you agree with what I have said?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
It is worth reading the evidence that the committee received, cabinet secretary—