The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3161 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
It is early days. I just wonder what your thoughts and plans are. I believe that the influence of diplomatic efforts, particularly in the creation of the friends of Scotland group, is important. However, the friends of Scotland group in the European Parliament has only 23 members out of 720 MEPs. That is not even one per member state of the European Union. Maybe you can tell us what you will do to change that, so that we can have more friends of Scotland in the friends of Scotland group.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
It appears to keep coming back to leadership; my conclusion from your report and from your evidence this morning is that there has been a lack of leadership from the board. I am happy to be challenged on that because one of the other comments that is in the report is about a defensive culture in the organisation. A number of stakeholders commented on that. Was that what you discovered? Was there a defensive mentality? Was there an unwillingness to address weaknesses?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
So this is ring-fenced sums of money?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
We are back to leadership and strategy again.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
We want to be bigger, though—right?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
You are quite happy with 23 members, then. I thought that I would hear some great plan about how we would increase the membership to at least the number of member states of the European Union.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
Would Pam Duncan-Glancy agree that part of the way to tackle the country’s health challenges, as well as the child poverty that John Mason mentions, is by investing in the people of Scotland through skills, education and training—the very things that are supposed to be the focus of the bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
I heard very clearly what the minister said. I simply add in relation to amendment 141 that, if the Scottish Government is asking the Funding Council to take on an expanded and more complex role, the council should operate under a clear and disciplined statutory framework of the kind that a number of amendments in this group have spelled out. Nevertheless, I look forward to further engagement with the minister in relation to the reporting criteria. I will not be moving amendment 141.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
On amendment 17, I noted subsection (6), in particular, which talks about “socio-economic groups” that are “under-represented” and so on. Interestingly, no part of that amendment—and particularly not that part—mentions apprenticeships. Is the minister not concerned that there might be underrepresented socioeconomic groups that are unable to access apprenticeships?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
My amendments 146 to 149 in this group seek to deal with how the Scottish Funding Council will exercise the significant and expanded functions that the bill will confer on it. I have lodged the amendments because, as the bill currently stands, the framework for exercising those functions lacks essential safeguards, clarity and discipline. Without those amendments, the council would be asked to shoulder major new responsibilities without the statutory requirements that are necessary to ensure transparency, consistency and a focus on Scotland’s long-term interests.
Amendment 146 seeks to ensure that, when the council exercises its functions, it does so in a way that is aligned with Scotland’s economic needs. My party has consistently argued that the tertiary system should be one of the central drivers of national productivity and national competitiveness. However, although legislation requires the council
“to have regard to ... skills needs in Scotland”,
I believe that that requirement is too broad and allows for crucial factors to be overlooked.
Amendment 146 seeks to correct that by requiring the Funding Council to have explicit regard to Scotland’s employer demand, labour market shortages, skills needs and, crucially, future economic priorities at national and regional levels. Legislating to match support to employer demand will reduce, as far as possible, the funding of low-value courses that do not correspond to employer demand and which result in young people being stuck either in unemployment or in jobs that do not match their skill sets.
I believe that legally mandating that the council have regard to our labour market shortages will force the council to prioritise addressing crucial reoccurring gaps in our national workforce and to prioritise emerging sectors, such as artificial intelligence, to ensure that Scotland is at the forefront of emerging sectors. It is also crucial to mandate that economic priorities at both national and regional levels be considered, as that will ensure that the distinct skills needs in every part of Scotland are not overlooked by a centralised body in Edinburgh.
The amendment would ensure that the council’s work was not simply administrative but strategic, purposeful and grounded in the realities of the economy that it is meant to serve in the present and in the future.