The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2155 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 September 2021
Stephen Kerr
We have a number of questions about the communications dimension, which we really want to understand more about.
Audrey, do you want to come in?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 September 2021
Stephen Kerr
Did you catch the whole question?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 September 2021
Stephen Kerr
We are going to have evidence later from the NASUWT—I have to get these acronyms right. It talks a lot about the “compression” that you have been describing in terms of assessment, how difficult it was—“impossible”, it says—for teachers to complete all the work that they were asked to do, including the quality assurance and certification, and about the effect that that had on the teachers. I am sure that you are conscious of that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 September 2021
Stephen Kerr
Welcome back. We will hear further evidence on the alternative certification model from our second panel of witnesses. I welcome Larry Flanagan, general secretary of the Educational Institute of Scotland; Seamus Searson, general secretary of the Scottish Secondary Teachers Association; and Tara Lillis, national official for Scotland at the NASUWT.
Thank you for providing us with your written submissions, which are very interesting and useful. We have a lot of ground to cover and not as much time as we would like, so we will move straight to questions unless any of you has something short and specific that you would like to say first. I see that you are all happy to move straight to questions.
Larry, you state on page 3 of your written submission that
“the Scottish Government or the SQA ... were determined to push ahead with national sampling of all courses”.
Did you ask for a rationale or a justification at the time for the Government’s determination to push on with that? If so, what did it say to you?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 September 2021
Stephen Kerr
In your submission, you mention a number of times that you believe that there was a hugely political dimension. On page 3, you mention the awareness of the forthcoming Scottish Parliament elections. How much of the decision making in the process was driven, in your view, by a political agenda from the Scottish Government?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 September 2021
Stephen Kerr
There were a lot of noises off, as you call them, in political terms. Education is a huge issue in Scotland. It is a priority in people’s lives, and that is a jolly good thing. However, the Government was clearly in the driving seat and making the decisions.
There are many questions that I could ask, but I will put just one more question to you, because I want to bring my colleagues in. On the sampling issue, you make in your submission the rather incendiary comment that
“the EIS’s trust in teacher judgement was not matched by that of the Scottish Government”.
On what basis do you say that?
11:15Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 September 2021
Stephen Kerr
The point that I am trying to make is that you are saying something fairly damning about the Scottish Government’s trust and belief in teachers.
Before I bring in Kaukab Stewart, the deputy convener, I have a question for Tara Lillis on a subject that we touched on with the previous panel. Tara, you mention in your submission the concept of overassessment and the compression that went on in the assessments this year. Have you or any of your members sought to define that? If so, what conclusions have you reached?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Stephen Kerr
I am sorry to interrupt—I do not wish to be rude—but I had better bring in my colleagues shortly. Is it fair to say that there were changes between the draft and the final report?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Stephen Kerr
Under the next item, the committee must consider another piece of subordinate legislation. The regulations are being considered under the negative procedure.
As members have no comments to make on the regulations, are we agreed that the committee does not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Stephen Kerr
Fair enough.