The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2166 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Stephen Kerr
That is fair enough. I suspect that Ellie Bevan might be in the same boat. I keep coming back to you for opinions, Professor Cardwell. What is your response?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Stephen Kerr
It is accepted in the UK. I think that the UK was number 1 in 2021 and is always in the top two, which is something to be grateful for. That is because of the kinds of things that we are talking about.
I have a question for Ms Bevan from Taith. I admire the way in which the Labour Administration in Wales has invested in Taith. You basically have about £15 million a year over a four-year stretch to invest in it. In Scotland, there is nothing, other than—as Gillian Mackay mentioned—SEEP, which has, I think, had only £1 million of funding in total. We are really far behind Wales.
Have you had discussions with the Scottish Government about what we can learn from Taith so that we can fast-track the roll-out of our own version of it in Scotland? I think that that would have cross-party support.
10:15Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Stephen Kerr
As a Scottish Parliament committee, we are interested in what is happening in Scotland and the Scottish Government’s initiative in this policy area. Did I hear correctly that you have not had any interaction with the people who are administering SEEP? I agree that there is so much to learn from talking to everybody and anybody about all those ideas and how to best make them work. Am I right in understanding that this end of the UK has not engaged with you at all?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Stephen Kerr
I will continue on the same subject that Alexander Stewart raised and that you have been commenting on, Professor Cardwell. Can you give us a breakdown of how much of the roughly £270 million a year that the UK was paying in to Erasmus+ would have been spent directly on UK students—specifically students rather than staff or others—for them to go and spend time in the European Union?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Stephen Kerr
At the beginning, I should have declared an interest in that my daughter took part in the Erasmus+ programme when she was a student. She went to Nancy for, I think, five months as part of her degree at the University of Stirling.
I am a big, enthusiastic supporter of student exchanges, but I want to ensure that the maximum opportunity is available to students, regardless of their background. That is why I am interested in how much of the funding was spent directly on UK students and how that money was spent. I have a fair idea, because I have in front of me some numbers from the House of Commons library that are contained in the wider briefing that we received. According to those numbers, there were roughly 10,000 UK higher education participants in the Erasmus+ programme annually, but the number who participate in the Turing scheme is three times that. I think that Peter Brown said that the Turing scheme is all-directional.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Stephen Kerr
Unidirectional?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Stephen Kerr
Do you know what the length of stay in an institution would be? I mentioned five months. Do we know how long the nearly 30,000 students spent in the institutions that they went to? Is that information available, to your knowledge?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Stephen Kerr
I was directing that question at Professor Cardwell, unless—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Stephen Kerr
In that case, you will be pleased to hear that I do not necessarily agree with it. I think that it is important that we measure what we have now against what we had then.
One aspect of Erasmus+ was that it included academic staff—Turing does not. In the Turing arrangement, staff members are expected to do the bilateral networking that you described earlier, directly funded by themselves or their institution, or through another method. Previously, those exchanges were publicly funded. I want to get a feel for what has changed. Can you quantify the level of academic exchange that is going on now, compared with what we had previously?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2025
Stephen Kerr
I am very happy for you to answer.