The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3353 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
Indeed.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
Cabinet secretary, you rightly paid tribute to the national performing companies, but you seem reluctant to acknowledge the consequence of what the convener rather generously called a standstill budget. In fact, the amount of money that has been given to the national performing companies has been at a standstill since 2008.
I did not catch all the numbers that you recited during an earlier answer, but I have the 2026-27 numbers for Scottish Opera. For 2026-27, it will get £8.6 million. In 2008, it got £8.5 million. This year’s number for RSNO is £4.2 million. In 2008, it was £4.3 million. By any measurement, that is a dramatic cut over time in the money that the national performing companies are receiving.
I know that you appreciate all the aspects of the world-class standard of performance that we get from our national companies, so surely you recognise the damage that has been done in recent years, and which is now going to be further inflicted on the national performing companies, particularly in the light of what the convener disclosed in relation to changes in the nature of the performers’ contracts. I do not think that, philosophically and politically, you would agree with those contract changes. What are you doing to the national performing companies through the approach that you are taking to their funding?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
I point out to those who might be watching, listening or reading the proceedings of this committee that you are responsible for a budget of £416 million. I would have thought, given your personal interest, which I acknowledge, that you might somehow have been able to be more generous and break the cycle that has lasted almost the entirety of the period that the Scottish National Party has been in government. During that time, the national performing companies have basically been shortchanged, even in the context base increases, such as the employer national insurance contribution increases, which we both bemoan. The money that they have had in increases last year and this year does not even cover that. That is the reality.
Do you have an answer to my earlier question?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
There are lots of questions that I would like to ask. Like last week, I will probably have to write a letter.
I wanted to talk to you, cabinet secretary, about the level 4 spreadsheet for the budget, and specifically about the narratives against the numbers. I also wanted to check and confirm with you that the amounts of money mentioned at level 4 that I queried in the chamber back on 14 January are correct. I ask you to confirm that there will be an additional £100,000 for the Scottish Library and Information Council, £500,000 for film houses in Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen, £1.2 million for something called an expo fund—perhaps you can say something about that briefly—and £600,000 for the proposed new museum of empire, slavery, colonialism and migration. Can you confirm that funding, along with the funding that is identified in the spreadsheet for Screen Scotland?
I ask that because you rightly pointed out in a letter to the convener, in response to the point of order that I made, that you were at risk of breaking legal provisions in the Public Services Reform (Scotland) Act 2010 by becoming involved in giving direction in relation to artistic or cultural judgment through the money that you are awarding.
Who wrote the narratives?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
The narrative.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
Oh, it is £111 million.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
What does that mean for additional money that might go to independent artists, for example? Is that going up? I do not have the relative figures to compare.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
The level 4 spreadsheet for the budget had some specific line items that would, I think, have suggested that there was some form of direction from the Scottish ministers; although the wording may have been clumsy. Are you familiar with what I am talking about?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
This is in relation to the Screen Scotland level 4 spreadsheet line. It said:
“To support growth of screen sector and reach goal of £1bn GVA by 2030”.
That was subsequently edited. The cabinet secretary was up front with the committee and said that officials had been concerned that the text against Screen Scotland funding lines might suggest that the Government is directing Screen Scotland how to deploy its grant-in-aid funding. Language can often reveal a lot. In your experience, are the section 40 provisions being adhered to? Have you have ever come across a situation in which you have had to respond to the Scottish ministers making an artistic or cultural judgment in relation to funding?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
What about the £500,000 for film houses in Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen?