The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2964 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
How does the bill, which in your opening remarks you described as “elegant”, compare with existing legislation such as that in Australia?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
Okay, thank you. Professor Schafer, what is your comment on the bill in the context of the law in the rest of the United Kingdom?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
I was about to turn to him, because he was referenced.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
What are the other ramifications of the issue with voluntary carbon credits that we have discussed? Are there other implications that we have not heard about yet?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
I could ask a thousand questions. I feel that I need a private tutorial from each of the witnesses to even begin to get my mind around so much of what you are talking about. From a lawmaker’s point of view, my concern is that the definitions that are in the bill are adequate and do not result in immediate legal action, which I think is what Jill Robbie alluded to—or did I misunderstand? Is the definition of a digital asset sufficiently clear in the bill that it will not, in and of itself, create more uncertainty?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
I am not a lawyer and I am certainly not a professor of any of these matters. Some of the language, terminology and new words continue to nearly bamboozle me. I am turning to you, Jill Robbie, because you have expressed concerns—very forcibly, actually—about the implications for the bill of article 1 of protocol 1 to the European convention on human rights. Could you expand on those, please?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
How would you change the bill?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
Are you talking about voluntary carbon credits, or could other things, which I think of as intangibles—
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
No, and, clearly, I do not either—hence my conundrum.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
What brought about the situation where you observed—at least, it is mentioned—a lack of effective challenge at board level?