The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 810 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Okay. If you were directing our thoughts on that, where would you take us?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Are you content with that response, Mr O’Kane?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Are you sure that you do not want to have a go at explaining some of that, Mr Bell? I understand that it is technical, but I suppose the challenge is to make it understandable. Part of our role is to understand, so I will push you a little further.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I thank the panel members for their opening remarks. I hope that we can get underneath the issues in some detail, so, when you are responding to questions, please stick to the question, because my colleagues will come in on other areas.
To start us off, will the witnesses outline their views on arguments that a single independent regulator for the legal profession would be beneficial? Colin, do you have a view on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Annie, are you content?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
That is a really interesting example.
Neil Stevenson, you can come in—very briefly.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thanks for that. You said that you do not have carte blanche. In your written evidence, you state that you have some concerns about the bill and the fact that responsibility for dealing with complaints remains split between bodies will prevent the complaints process being “seamless”. It would be helpful if you could give a wee example of that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
We would welcome being kept informed about that. When you are in a position to issue timescales, please write to the committee and let us know.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
That was helpful. The bill has been around for a long time and, as far as young people are concerned, I think that the good-will winds are, in a sense, behind it. Obviously, though, the committee has a duty to look underneath and work together on the detail.
On that note, I thank the cabinet secretary for her extensive contributions and her officials for appearing before the committee. That concludes this morning’s formal business, and I thank everyone again.
11:57 Meeting continued in private until 12:12.Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
No problem. The main thrust of it is whether, through the bill, a citizen will be able to make a complaint in the least traumatising way possible. Will they manage to navigate the system, and what is the likelihood of their getting a clear outcome?