The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1452 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 27 January 2022
Collette Stevenson
I note from the name of the proposed CPG that the focus is on upland management. As the constituency MSP for East Kilbride, I have been looking at lowland deer management. You touched on upland deer management, which involves a different type of deer. Every day is a school day at the moment. You learn something new. Has there been talk about sharing information on that? We have little in the way of lowland deer management in the central belt of Scotland. Are we isolating that? I do not want to be left out, Paul.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 27 January 2022
Collette Stevenson
Good morning. You touched on inclusivity. I looked at the list of members of the proposed group and noted that they are all males. What are you doing with fellow members on that list to attract female members to the group to improve its inclusivity?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Collette Stevenson
On FAIs, there have been issues with the procurement contract for pathology and toxicology. Audit Scotland raised that issue in its annual audit report. I took some comfort from the committee’s meeting with the Lord Advocate, who said that a new contract has been introduced, which might reduce the length of time that some FAIs take. I also just note that, obviously, there has been a big issue during the pandemic, because of the strain on the national health service.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Collette Stevenson
Good morning. I was going to touch on retention and the destruction of opened mail, but I am conscious that that has been covered quite well.
When mail is tested and is found not to contain any drugs, is it handed over to the prisoner while they are still in custody or at the end of their sentence? Excuse my ignorance, but what tests are carried out, given the volume of mail that comes in? Are a lot of tests carried out, or are just one or two particular items tested? What are your findings in that regard?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Collette Stevenson
I want to ask about another issue relating to mitigation of the amount of mail that comes in. HM Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland has recommended the provision of in-cell telephony. Cabinet secretary, what progress, if any, has been made on installing telephony in each of the prisons?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 12 January 2022
Collette Stevenson
Okay—thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 December 2021
Collette Stevenson
That was really interesting. I do not know whether Mr Harvie wants to come in. If not, I will be happy to hand back to you, convener.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 December 2021
Collette Stevenson
Good morning, Lord Advocate and Mr Harvie. As the convener has said, we have had some powerful contributions from survivors in previous sessions, and I want to look at the role of the advocate depute in this process. We have been told that going through the system is like a second violation, and I want to ask about the way in which statements are taken when a case is prosecuted. In some cases, statements were taken four or five times. Moreover, when the prosecution element of the process was reached, it was found that the statement that was used was completely wrong compared with what had been provided, and the whole thing had taken years. Is that standard practice and, if so, why?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 December 2021
Collette Stevenson
I was touching on our evidence session with the survivors. There was very strong criticism of the process—not just the Crown prosecution but the police—in terms of giving statements, and of the interaction or lack of it from the advocate depute. My question was to see whether you feel that is standard practice, in terms of the delays—the years of backlog and whatnot. If so, why, and what can we do to rectify that?
11:00Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 December 2021
Collette Stevenson
Thank you. I do not know whether Mr Harvie wants to come in, if he is available.