Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 27 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1452 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 27 January 2022

Collette Stevenson

I note from the name of the proposed CPG that the focus is on upland management. As the constituency MSP for East Kilbride, I have been looking at lowland deer management. You touched on upland deer management, which involves a different type of deer. Every day is a school day at the moment. You learn something new. Has there been talk about sharing information on that? We have little in the way of lowland deer management in the central belt of Scotland. Are we isolating that? I do not want to be left out, Paul.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Cross-Party Groups

Meeting date: 27 January 2022

Collette Stevenson

Good morning. You touched on inclusivity. I looked at the list of members of the proposed group and noted that they are all males. What are you doing with fellow members on that list to attract female members to the group to improve its inclusivity?

Criminal Justice Committee

Pre-Budget Report (Scottish Government Response)

Meeting date: 19 January 2022

Collette Stevenson

On FAIs, there have been issues with the procurement contract for pathology and toxicology. Audit Scotland raised that issue in its annual audit report. I took some comfort from the committee’s meeting with the Lord Advocate, who said that a new contract has been introduced, which might reduce the length of time that some FAIs take. I also just note that, obviously, there has been a big issue during the pandemic, because of the strain on the national health service.

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 January 2022

Collette Stevenson

Good morning. I was going to touch on retention and the destruction of opened mail, but I am conscious that that has been covered quite well.

When mail is tested and is found not to contain any drugs, is it handed over to the prisoner while they are still in custody or at the end of their sentence? Excuse my ignorance, but what tests are carried out, given the volume of mail that comes in? Are a lot of tests carried out, or are just one or two particular items tested? What are your findings in that regard?

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 January 2022

Collette Stevenson

I want to ask about another issue relating to mitigation of the amount of mail that comes in. HM Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland has recommended the provision of in-cell telephony. Cabinet secretary, what progress, if any, has been made on installing telephony in each of the prisons?

Criminal Justice Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 January 2022

Collette Stevenson

Okay—thank you.

Criminal Justice Committee

Prosecution of Violence against Women and Girls

Meeting date: 22 December 2021

Collette Stevenson

That was really interesting. I do not know whether Mr Harvie wants to come in. If not, I will be happy to hand back to you, convener.

Criminal Justice Committee

Prosecution of Violence against Women and Girls

Meeting date: 22 December 2021

Collette Stevenson

Good morning, Lord Advocate and Mr Harvie. As the convener has said, we have had some powerful contributions from survivors in previous sessions, and I want to look at the role of the advocate depute in this process. We have been told that going through the system is like a second violation, and I want to ask about the way in which statements are taken when a case is prosecuted. In some cases, statements were taken four or five times. Moreover, when the prosecution element of the process was reached, it was found that the statement that was used was completely wrong compared with what had been provided, and the whole thing had taken years. Is that standard practice and, if so, why?

Criminal Justice Committee

Prosecution of Violence against Women and Girls

Meeting date: 22 December 2021

Collette Stevenson

I was touching on our evidence session with the survivors. There was very strong criticism of the process—not just the Crown prosecution but the police—in terms of giving statements, and of the interaction or lack of it from the advocate depute. My question was to see whether you feel that is standard practice, in terms of the delays—the years of backlog and whatnot. If so, why, and what can we do to rectify that?

11:00  

Criminal Justice Committee

Prosecution of Violence against Women and Girls

Meeting date: 22 December 2021

Collette Stevenson

Thank you. I do not know whether Mr Harvie wants to come in, if he is available.