The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1414 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Collette Stevenson
I have a supplementary question. Is it also possible to have details on the geographical spread, to see whether there is a trend in certain areas or regions? That would be really helpful.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Collette Stevenson
Can you provide percentages or numbers in relation to that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Collette Stevenson
My other question is an overarching one. In your submissions, you look at each of the sections in the bill. Rather than a critical analysis, do you have any suggestions for amendments to the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2023
Collette Stevenson
I have no further questions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
Collette Stevenson
Can I flip this around? I agree with Edward Mountain about the length of time that it takes for a motion to be approved. I am going to link this to CPGs, which is relevant to what we have been discussing today. I am a member of the CPG on medicinal cannabis, which is an issue that affects a constituent of mine. Given the evidence that was presented at that CPG, I lodged a motion and I got such strong support for it that it was the first time that I was able to lead a members’ business debate in the chamber. That was really effective, and it is evidence of how effectively CPGs can work and how motions can take such issues forward.
Equally, some of the motions that have been lodged are particularly weak, and I strongly agree with Edward Mountain on that, as well as with Graeme Dey’s letter.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Collette Stevenson
Good morning. I will touch on the issue of release on licence for long-term prisoners. As an independent prison monitor, Wendy Sinclair-Gieben will know that one of the biggest issues is progression through a long-term sentence. One of the stark stats is that the open prison is being utilised at only 52 per cent or something at the moment. The bill will remove the home detention curfew and introduce a reintegration licence, and there will be a new system of temporary release. In relation to temporary release, the situation in the open prison does not bode well, does it?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Collette Stevenson
David, do you want to come in?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Collette Stevenson
Okay. That is interesting.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Collette Stevenson
I have just one question, which relates to the reasons for refusing bail. The bill looks to expand the current requirement for a court to state and record the reasons for refusing bail. Do you think that that will be helpful?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Collette Stevenson
I want to come back in on the rehabilitation courses, which are intended to reduce reoffending when people come back out into the community. We know that it is hard for them to get on to such courses and to progress through them, but do you think that the courses work in reassuring victims and the community? When people go through into reintegration, should there be an overlap whereby such courses continue?