The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1414 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Collette Stevenson
Would the inspectorate raise issues, if there are any, on a regular basis with each prison?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Collette Stevenson
I will just quickly ask one more question. Sorry, convener, but I will finish on this.
Will you consult on the review with the inspectorate and each of the prison monitors and seek feedback from them?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Collette Stevenson
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Collette Stevenson
Is the inspectorate fairly comfortable with the policy in its current format?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Collette Stevenson
Does the policy in its current format meet with the standards of the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Collette Stevenson
I have a comment rather than a request for further information. It is an observation on the report. The progress that has been made on in-cell telephony is a good news story. We will get regular updates on how it is being rolled out and its benefits, but any feedback on that would be very much welcome. It is a very good thing, and I congratulate the SPS on taking that forward.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Collette Stevenson
Thanks, and good morning. I want to look at the lessons learned review, which is currently under way. Have you considered looking at other countries that are outwith the UK for examples of good practice in the treatment of transgender prisoners and other vulnerable prisoners in prison estates?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Collette Stevenson
I am fairly okay in terms of the capital budget. I would like to get clarification on that, particularly in the light of the fact that HMP Greenock is a cause for concern, given what we have heard previously in evidence sessions. Apart from the capital spend, I am fairly comfortable with everything else.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Collette Stevenson
Yes. Perhaps we can also seek clarification regarding the paragraph that begins at the bottom of page 5 of the clerk’s note, under the “Justice Transformation” heading. It goes on to talk about “blue light collaborations”. I am not quite sure what that means. It seems that the Government is viring money from the police reform budget over to cross-justice reforms. Can we seek clarification on that point?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 February 2023
Collette Stevenson
I have a suggestion on the back of Edward Mountain’s point. The use of the proxy vote was very repetitive at stage 3, so I wonder whether, initially, it could be said that someone is acting as proxy for another MSP and the constituency or region that that MSP covers, but, after that, we could maybe use a placard, for example, rather than having to constantly say something. It seemed very repetitive and it prolonged the voting process each time.