The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1414 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Collette Stevenson
Turning to you, Sam, I note from the evidence from the interviewees in the sample interviews that there was a lack of support or signposting for people who were trying to report an incident to police, and there was an issue around being taken seriously. Will you say more about that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Collette Stevenson
Good morning. I will go with the same thread of questioning that I put to the previous panel, which was on the experience of victims and witnesses. We have heard that, for children who go through the system, there has been an adverse impact on coming forward.
The “Justice Report” from the everyday heroes programme, which the previous panel touched on, contains a quote from a child, who said:
“You get trauma from the bad person then more trauma from the people in the system.”
What wider work are you involved in that is aimed at improving the experience of victims and witnesses in domestic abuse cases? I put that question to Moira Price first.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Collette Stevenson
It is particularly children.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Collette Stevenson
Can I come back in on what you said? You took evidence about impact. Have you seen dramatic effects caused by the lifting of NHOs?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Collette Stevenson
Good morning, and happy international women’s day, everyone.
What impact has the act had on the consideration of victim safety when an offender receives a sentence or a non-harassment order? From the wealth of evidence that has been taken, it appears that where NHOs are used, they are not extended to a victim’s children. What impact has that had on coercive control?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Collette Stevenson
I put the same question to Craig Naylor.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Collette Stevenson
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Collette Stevenson
Good morning, professor. In addition to prisons, I want to touch on the sentencing aspect. The report stated that there was very little use of community disposals, particularly for people with mental health conditions. Do you think that that is in relation to the forensic mental health system or criminal justice more generally? What do you feel needs to be done about that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2023
Collette Stevenson
On that subject, I had a conversation with Wendy Sinclair-Gieben, HM chief inspector of prisons, and one of the things that we were talking about was alternative disposals and electronic monitoring and taking that a step further. I know that, in England and Wales, a sobriety cuff is used, but our conversation was more about tapping into technology, such as a device to monitor a person’s sleep or an electronic tag, which would not only make sure that the person was at home for a certain length of time, but alert them about when they should go and speak to their social worker. Have you come across anything like that? Was any work done on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2023
Collette Stevenson
The response is interesting. It is almost as if the SCTS is saying, “We have tried it out so let’s move on.” However, we are looking at budget cuts and there are huge efficiencies to be made in virtual trials. In particular, prisoners could attend court virtually rather than the likes of GEOAmey having to be used so that they can attend.
There seems to be some push-back against having virtual trials. I made that observation on our visit to Glasgow sheriff court. There are a variety of reasons why we could have virtual trials. The police have to use up their rest days, but they could attend virtually and, in that way, they would not need to be replaced, depending on how long the trial lasts. There are a huge number of efficiencies to be made by carrying on with virtual trials, notwithstanding the impact on complainers.