The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 692 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Màiri McAllan
Thank you for those points. I agree with you; as peatland restoration grows in popularity and as we do what we need to do in forestry and planting, the pressure will mount on the folks who consider the applications. In these circumstances, I am absolutely confident that Scottish Forestry has the capacity to take on what it will be required to do. In fact, this approach will take some weight off the local authorities. Because in the interim period applicants were not required to apply to Forestry Scotland for a felling licence, the issue would have fallen to local authorities for consideration. This correction allows the matter to go back to Scottish Forestry, which I am confident can manage things.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Màiri McAllan
Despite the delay, I would still like to make some opening remarks, just to give the committee an overview of our proposal.
Thank you for having me along to discuss the Forestry (Exemptions) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2021. The Forestry (Exemptions) (Scotland) Regulations 2019 set out the felling activities that can be carried out without a specific felling licence from the regulator, which in this case is Scottish Forestry.
The first proposed amendment to the regulations is to correct a minor typographical error in the definition of “statutory undertaker”, where the word “power” will be amended to “pier” as originally intended.
The second and more substantive amendment seeks to respond to an unintended consequence that has arisen from new planning regulations laid earlier this year that created a permitted development right for peatland restoration projects. If not corrected, it could potentially result in the tree-felling component of peatland restoration schemes not being given the full consideration and proper scrutiny by Scottish Forestry that is supposed to happen, and, at its worst, it could result in large-scale tree felling as part of a peatland restoration project without sustainable forest management principles being applied.
That unintended consequence was identified during the development of the PDR for peatland restoration, and the proposed response that we are laying before the committee today was agreed on as a pragmatic way of ensuring that sustainable forest management will be fully integrated with peatland restoration permitted development rights.
Applicants for peatland restoration schemes that propose deforestation are already required to obtain an environmental impact assessment from Scottish Forestry and to apply to the local authority for the permitted development right. The effect of this amendment will be that they will also need to apply to Scottish Forestry for felling permission. Such permission can be applied for at the same time as requesting the environmental impact assessment that I mentioned, and we would advise that that be done prior to applying to the local authority for the permitted development right. With regard to the planning period for a peatland restoration PDR, the process is a rigorous one, requiring in-depth surveys and data analysis, and I am comfortable that the process contains sufficient time to cover this additional step of obtaining a felling licence.
I do not want to speak for too long, so, in summary, Scottish Government policy, including Scottish Forestry policy, supports the restoration of peatlands involving deforestation where it can be shown that the change of land use is in line with public benefit and can produce a public good. The obvious example is emissions reduction, but there are others including biodiversity gain and community benefit.
I hope that that explains our proposals, and I am content to take members’ questions.