The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 692 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
It does not mean that. NatureScot has officers who are integrated into their communities and who understand a great deal about what is happening in those communities. The point is that the advice that we took from NatureScot was about the conservation status as a whole, and we had to respond to that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
If the solution that Mr Ewing is referring to is that I instruct law officers to make a statement that a criminal offence will not be prosecuted, he is doing a disservice to the legal profession that he was once part of. It is just not a realistic solution.
I have in front of me the three written submissions that the Scottish Government has made to the committee. I am here today in good faith. I do not believe that the changes made to the protection of the status of one species undermine the practice of falconry in Scotland to the extent that Mr Ewing suggests. We have to bear in mind the fact that the golden eagle is probably the only species of falcon that would be large enough to take a mountain hare. Falconers use a range of other species and they pursue a range of quarry.
There is also a licensing scheme for the protection of young timber and agricultural land and the preservation of natural habits that allows for the taking of mountain hare. That would be an opportunity for those who have golden eagles to exercise and use their birds in that way.
I believe that all of that is justified on the basis of the advice from our statutory advisors, NatureScot.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
I will pass over to NatureScot to answer on whether that is small number of licenses, given that the legislation has been in force for only a short period.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
It depends on the context. The legislation has been in force only since March 2021 and the division of licences reflects the discussion that we had about the fact that mountain hares are far more frequently taken by shooting than by birds of prey. That is just a reflection of the state of play.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
I am not sure that that is the case. I think that they can take off in other areas of the country. Obviously, a trained falconer would know a great deal more about that than I or we do, but we say that the quarry that is being pursued is the principal factor that differentiates upland falconry from other types, although there are other variables. Stan, do you want to come in?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
That is a policy question, to be fair. We act on the basis of advice that NatureScot gives us on the conservation status of and risk to animals, but it is for us to make the decisions. I absolutely accept that there is a marked difference in the numbers that are taken by shooting mountain hare and those that are taken through falconry. However, I come back to the core point, which is that our statutory advisers, NatureScot, are telling us, in a nature emergency, that there is a conservation risk to mountain hare. We have to be prepared to take action in the face of that. That action has to be proportionate but, equally, consistent.
Again, I acknowledge the concerns of the petitioner, and everything that the committee has said, but, equally, I ask how we could justify action that restricted people’s ability to take an animal for recreational purposes by shooting but did not apply similar conditions on those who would take it by other means. It is about consistency.
As I have said, for example, throughout the current consideration of the Hunting With Dogs (Scotland) Bill, we are grappling with those questions of consistency in all the ways that people seek to hunt with dogs in the countryside. We have to have a consistent approach.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
I do not think that Mr Whitaker said that NatureScot has “no idea”. What he said, I think, was that such figures are not collected.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
Will you repeat the statement?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
It was specifically to do with the threatened status of the mountain hare as a whole.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Màiri McAllan
Mr Ewing, I understand that you were the cabinet secretary at the time—