The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 876 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Elena Whitham
Deputy First Minister, you will be aware of the recently published international review that was conducted by the local governance review team. Quebec, where I grew up, is the location of one of the case studies. Despite the gradual growth in municipal powers over the past decade, with nearly all local budgets being raised through local taxation, there has not yet been a significant increase in citizen participation. Which countries and examples from the review are getting the relationships and resource allocations between the different spheres of government right?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Elena Whitham
Has anyone else put an R in the chat box, convener?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Elena Whitham
As we have just heard from the COSLA president, functional empowerment is a key aspect of the local governance review. Considering that efficient government is within your remit, is it a Scottish Government commitment to have more regional and collaborative approaches to service delivery?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Elena Whitham
Before I ask my question, I will declare an interest: I am still a serving councillor on East Ayrshire Council.
In my council area, communities are supported to create their own community-led action plans. They need to get at least a 40 per cent return from households in their community for their plan to be a sovereign document, which is then represented in community planning and is the basis for local place plans.
How do your organisations ensure that all voices are heard within communities, not just the voices of those who have the confidence, experience or resources to come forward? We can sometimes see the usual faces around the same tables.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Elena Whitham
I am aware that some people might not have heard my question, so I will repeat the last bit of it. Can Rona Mackay tell us how the community council in her area ensures that all the voices in the community are being heard and that it is not the same people around the table all the time? I suppose that the question is about how you ensure wider recognition of every voice in your community.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Elena Whitham
I will make a wee change of direction. Stretched resources have meant that we all need to work towards efficient government, in all spheres of governance. Do councils have the desire and the scope to work more collectively over regions to deliver services? If so, what needs to change for that to happen?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Elena Whitham
You made a key point when you talked about the reorganisation of local government in the 1970s. We still see the effects of that now. If we listen to people who do not feel empowered in communities, we find that they hark back to the days of their burgh council or town council, when they had a set of people who met locally in the area and one councillor who went to a wider national body. Given that people still hark back to those days, how do we make sure that the local governance review delivers the community empowerment and the functional and devolved power to local communities that we need?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Elena Whitham
Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Elena Whitham
I thank our witnesses for making the time to come and speak to us today. As you know, a big part of community fiscal empowerment is participatory budgeting, which has been greatly interrupted by the Covid pandemic. Will you give a temperature check on the commitment that 1 per cent of council budgets will be given over to communities for fiscal empowerment on decisions? Does progress stand out in some areas? Do other areas need more support?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Elena Whitham
I will do a quick mop-up, because my next question was answered in part when Stuart Mackinnon responded to a question from Willie Coffey. I want to give the witnesses an opportunity to explore the matter of some businesses—perhaps larger businesses, as Stuart Mackinnon mentioned—bringing in professional advisers to help them with the MCC appeal process. As Colin Wilkinson rightly pointed out, such businesses have perhaps benefited more during the pandemic than small and medium-sized enterprises, which might have been hit more.
Do the panellists have final thoughts on that aspect? How can we ensure that the small and medium-sized businesses that could not avail themselves of the MCC appeal process get adequate and correct support now? Colin Wilkinson mentioned that in the first place—does he have any thoughts?