The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 876 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Elena Whitham
So, at this point in time, you are content that it will be an iterative process because of the long lead-in time before we will see the results and that the best way of dealing with that will be through secondary legislation rather than through the bill.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Elena Whitham
Section 32 seeks to insert in the 1996 act provisions that deal with
“Liability for taking or killing stray farmed deer”.
In particular, it introduces an offence of
“failing to report taking or killing of stray farmed deer”
and a defence of civil liability in that regard. What are the reasons for introducing those provisions regarding stray farmed deer? Is it believed that they will effectively help with the management of stray farmed deer?
Looking at the provisions, it seems that they refer to the liability of the person who has actually taken the farmed deer as opposed to effective management to prevent farmed deer from escaping in the first place.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Elena Whitham
Last September, the committee took evidence from Fisheries Management Scotland, which pointed out to us that
“poaching for salmon and sea trout is the highest volume wildlife crime in Scotland”.—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 4 September 2024; c 29.]
It also has one of the highest rates of conviction of any class of wildlife crime.
However, fish poaching also has the lowest fines—under £250 on average—and wild salmon has been classified as an endangered species. There is a real concern that the fines do not act as a disincentive for that illegal activity. FMS has identified that the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill could be a means of introducing amendments to the Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 2003. I would like to flesh that out and to ask whether officials will commit to working with FMS to examine the potential for an amendment to be made to the bill to increase the fines for the most serious of fish poaching offences.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Elena Whitham
I would also like to explore why there is no legal requirement in the bill to align the targets with the overarching 2030 or 2045 goals, given that the policy memorandum sets out the intention that the targets align with those timeframes. Why is that not in the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Elena Whitham
That is helpful. It is good to have a marker down in relation to the incentive schemes that you mentioned. Although the bill’s provisions may not address the issue, as you rightly point out, the committee needs to be very aware of the issue in the lowlands.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Elena Whitham
So, it is specifically about dealing with that rather than how we support farmers of deer to ensure that they do not have escapes into the wild.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Elena Whitham
Good morning, everybody. The convener has already touched on this issue. Given that the goal is to halt nature decline by 2030, when will the Scottish Government seek to commence section 1 to ensure that regulations are introduced within a meaningful timeframe, given the tight timeframe that is in front of us?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Elena Whitham
I will come back on that briefly. I could also speak about this topic all day, given my background as a Scottish Women’s Aid worker.
Do you feel that we are at a point at which we are speaking a lot about the issue but have not quite realised the embedding and mainstreaming of full equalities, including taking a gendered look at the different policy decisions that we make? Will the absence of a human rights bill make that more tricky to achieve? Do you feel that it is the panacea that will help us to get over that hurdle and implement those things on the ground?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Elena Whitham
My apologies, convener—the technical issues that I experienced at the beginning of the meeting meant that I missed the first few discussion points.
I wish to explore the structural barriers to justice a little bit further and, specifically, how those relate to the quest for human rights budgeting. We could also think about that issue in terms of the mainstreaming of equalities, perhaps with a gendered lens on it—that is, we need to think about gender budgeting as well. I am really aware of the issue of access to justice for those seeking remedy for domestic abuse, specifically in remote and Highlands and Islands areas. Would either Angela O’Hagan or Luis Yanes comment on that, please?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Elena Whitham
That illustrates well the issue that I have come across over many years. When we talk about the size of the pie, we forget about how the pie is divvied up and how organisations are responsible for divvying it up in a way that reflects the needs of the people they are seeking to serve. It is helpful that we have that on record in the committee this morning. Thank you.