Seòmar agus comataidhean

Thank you for that. I see that Julian Gardner would like to come in.

That is very helpful. You have both answered a couple of my other questions, but I have a final question on safeguarding. If we get to the amending stage with the bill, is there anything that you would caution us about putting in place? We have already mentioned the timeframes, the so-called gagging clause and so on, but is there anything that you would advise the committee to think about if we get to that stage?

I have no interests to declare at this point.

I thank the minister for coming along this morning.

I put on record the fact that everyone on this committee is a responsible committee member. Notwithstanding that, the fact is that 80 per cent of Scotland is a less favoured area, and I would have concerns about payments not being made, given the short timeframe that we are talking about. I would therefore echo some of the sentiments that have just been expressed by my colleague Emma Roddick. As we move forward, having a longer timeframe would be beneficial so that we can delve a little bit deeper into the issue. I just wanted to put that on the record.

Like my colleagues, I have some sympathy with the motions that Maggie Chapman has lodged. We all want a system that has fairness baked into it and that provides access across the board. As a former Women’s Aid worker, I have seen time and again the issues that women face in trying to access justice. We have heard from the minister about the fact that we have already dealt with some exemptions in that area, which were very welcome.

I take on board Ms Chapman’s comments about the fact that we do not have a level of detail about where the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service would seek to make changes in relation to the difference of £4 million, but £4 million will make a difference if we do not proceed with the instruments that the minister has lodged. I sympathise with Ms Chapman’s points, but the committee has been clear about seeking more information in the future about how we deal with access to legal aid and justice. I hope that that information will come forward in future evidence sessions.

If we cannot pinpoint an average cost for that, is there a comparison that we can make with our neighbours in the rest of the United Kingdom? How do our fees compare with those in the rest of the UK?

My final question is on a point made by Professor Katie Boyle last week. Cabinet secretary, you have clearly set out our limitations with reference to the Supreme Court’s decision, and that could give rise to a Pandora’s box with lots of legislation that we have already passed being examined retrospectively.

Would you consider establishing a group of custodians on the bill’s development to date? That would transcend any changes that might happen after the upcoming Holyrood election, and it would provide some certainty for the people who have been working on the bill for such a long time that nothing will be lost.

Good morning. I have a few questions. Do you have any analysis of or statistics on what proportion of court fee income is paid for by banks, the insurance industry or similar large bodies, and what proportion is paid for by individuals? Do you have any such information?

Good morning. I have no relevant interests to declare for this morning’s meeting.

Good morning, cabinet secretary, and thank you for coming along. In your opening remarks, you made it clear that you still intend to forge forward with the incorporation of international human rights treaties. If that is still a priority for the Government, could you please explain to us how you will prioritise that during this session of Parliament?