The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1144 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Elena Whitham
The Scottish Pantry Network—and access to community grocery stores and so on—is something that we should be supporting and helping to flourish.
Given that a lot of convenience stores not only in some of our remote and rural areas but in population centres where there is a lot of deprivation will fall outwith the scope of what the regulations will deliver, how can the Government support such retailers to offer healthier food to the individuals whom they serve?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Good morning. I know that we only have a short amount of time for this item, so I will be brief. The regulations are quite narrow; they seek to have an impact on just one part of the commercial determinants of health. I am interested in understanding how they will impact on the social determinants of health, both in a positive way and in terms of any potential negative impacts that we might see on health inequalities.
Perhaps you can start, David. How do you feel that the regulations will impact on health inequalities?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Elena Whitham
It is important to get that on record. You alluded earlier to the fact that we have food deserts, with a lack of fresh food in some of our communities. That is not just in urban settings—it can be in rural settings, too. Even if people have the skills, knowledge and ability to cook fresh, healthy food and know what to do with it, they may not have access to it. Is it a real concern for NCD Alliance that some health inequalities may be slightly exacerbated if we do not work on the rest of the food environment in which people are living?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Good morning. I want to spend a little bit of time considering the impact that the regulations could have on inequalities.
Earlier, we heard from David McColgan from the NCD Alliance about food deserts and the impact that the lack of availability of fresh food can have on people who are experiencing inequalities. Can you explain how the population health framework and other food-related policy will mitigate any potential skewing effects of the regulations on inequalities? If we think about minimum unit pricing, although that had a good effect on the population, there could be a different impact on individuals.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
You mentioned public procurement, which is a hobby-horse of mine, so I want to explore that aspect a bit further. If we think about the landscape just now, we have pockets of really good work that has been done to push the envelope on public procurement in thinking about community empowerment and community wealth building; indeed, we will be debating the Community Wealth Building (Scotland) Bill at stage 1 later today. However, while we see those pockets of good work, we also see that things can change on a dime when a tendering package has been put forward: the cost is what wins it, rather than the idea of having due regard to sustainable development and wellbeing.
Is it your intention to ensure that public procurement also reflects the aims of the bill, so that, where we see progress being made—with positive proactive decisions supporting local businesses and creating a thriving economy in an area—we do not start to slip back because, for example, a big multinational that is not thinking about sustainability can undercut those businesses?
09:30Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
When you developed your bill, what lessons from the experience in Wales did you draw on?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
You mentioned the national performance framework. The committee has heard views that the existing duties that are placed on public bodies through the NPF and related legislation are too weak. Do you agree with that assertion?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Since your bill was introduced, Audit Wales has assessed that the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015—we are now a decade down the line—has been
“changing conversations, influencing longer-term planning, and impacting day-to-day decision-making and working practices”,
but has not yet driven
“the system-wide change that was intended”.
We are looking for the golden thread of how to get policy coherence and deliver on wellbeing and sustainable development. How would your bill achieve the system-wide changes that we are looking for?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
In taking evidence, the committee has heard overwhelming support for the policy objectives that are set out in the bill, including the one about policy coherence for sustainable development. We have also heard some witnesses say that those objectives could be met without a change in the law. How do you respond to that assertion?