The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1138 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
When you developed your bill, what lessons from the experience in Wales did you draw on?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
You mentioned the national performance framework. The committee has heard views that the existing duties that are placed on public bodies through the NPF and related legislation are too weak. Do you agree with that assertion?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Since your bill was introduced, Audit Wales has assessed that the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015—we are now a decade down the line—has been
“changing conversations, influencing longer-term planning, and impacting day-to-day decision-making and working practices”,
but has not yet driven
“the system-wide change that was intended”.
We are looking for the golden thread of how to get policy coherence and deliver on wellbeing and sustainable development. How would your bill achieve the system-wide changes that we are looking for?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
In taking evidence, the committee has heard overwhelming support for the policy objectives that are set out in the bill, including the one about policy coherence for sustainable development. We have also heard some witnesses say that those objectives could be met without a change in the law. How do you respond to that assertion?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
We have pockets of really good practice in Scotland, too. We might think of the moves that have been made in North Ayrshire with community solar farms and energy generation, for example. In the absence of a commissioner and legislation, would we just continue to have some pockets of good practice where public bodies have regard to sustainability and wellbeing in their local area? Could a revised national performance framework and revised national outcomes drive that change? Do you really believe that we need to have it in legislation?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Elena Whitham
We heard in evidence from the Scottish Government that it is reviewing the national outcomes and the national performance framework. It believes that what it will set out will help to deliver what you are trying to deliver with your bill. Is it possible that the Government will be able to achieve those aims with a review of the national performance framework and the national outcomes?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Elena Whitham
I want to explore that a bit further. Have you had any conversations with National Records of Scotland or Public Health Scotland about their interpretation of the data that is collected on a death certificate? I am thinking about Brian Whittle’s point. For example, if there were a cluster of a certain type of cancer in an area, would the information that would pertain follow through, in terms of its being recorded as the primary or secondary cause of death on the death certificate? Have you had any interaction with those bodies to understand how that information is used?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Elena Whitham
I have a query further to the point that Mr Whittle raised in relation to malicious intervention. If amendment 189 was agreed to, how do you foresee that a case in which someone asked for a review would proceed? That process could open up information about the deceased person’s medical history that they might not have wanted the individual who requested a review to know. They might not have had a loving relationship with that individual. What safeguarding would be put in that would respect the deceased person’s wishes?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Will the member give way?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Elena Whitham
I thank Pam Duncan-Glancy for putting that on the record. The difference, though, is that we do not have a track 2 proposed in the bill before us, and Liam McArthur’s amendments ensure that there will be no consideration of somebody as being terminally ill by dint of their having a disability or a mental health condition. Therefore, I am pretty convinced that we are not going along the same lines as what exists in Canada, and I do not think that the UN committee would see that, either.