The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2089 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
I could turn that round and ask, “If it is not the traffic commissioner, then who?” Who would be the decision maker? Do you want the decision to come back to ministers? That would bring the matter back into the political sphere. It was decided in 2019 that it would be taken out of the politicians’ hands, and that is where we are.
I am sorry, but what was the second part of your question, Monica? I did not write it down. I apologise.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
A consultation is on-going at the moment with—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
Sorry—my apologies. Let me correct the record. They will be consulting shortly on whether they are going to go for the franchising model.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
Absolutely—we want to get it right. However, I go back to a point that I made previously. If we stop and we do not proceed with the measures that are before us, we will potentially go back to square 1.
On the evidence that you heard from Mr Bray and the proposals that were rejected, there had been a recommendation, as opposed to a final decision. We could turn that round the other way: if a transport authority knows that the final decision could be taken out of its hands, then—going back to the point that I made to Mr Lumsden—it will make damn sure that it gets it right in the first place. It will therefore do all the work and the due diligence that it needs to do to ensure that, when it presents its proposal to the panel, it has done absolutely everything within its power.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
No. The panel will be required to make its decision within a six-month period, although it will be up to whoever is presenting the franchising proposal to ensure that they have done all the work that they need to do for it to be progressed.
We are taking a belt-and-braces approach. Anyone who cuts corners will get stopped, so why start in the first place? It is a matter of having certainty that someone else is taking another look—and they might say, “You didn’t do that bit.” Those who are making a proposal should therefore do it right in the first place.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
The approach that was taken there was based on the financial model alone; it did not take the whole picture into account. That is the fundamental difference. The proposal there was rejected on the basis of a financial model.
Clearly, the financial model is a really important aspect. We want to ensure that the business case has been made to the fullest extent, and it will include everything else. We are not comparing apples with apples here; we are comparing two different things.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
If we carry on with the legislation as it is, there will be a panel, regardless. That goes back to the point that Mr Lumsden made. [Interruption.] I will let you finish your point. I apologise; that was rude.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
I did not speak to the transport secretary when I learned that the motion to annul was being lodged. I looked at the concerns and at why this was becoming an issue. I take on board the issues, but I go back to the primary point that I made, which is that if the committee does not pass the SSI, that will set us back considerably.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
No. I envisage—and very much hope—that what will happen next is that the committee will pass the SSI today, which will allow us to continue to move forward with franchising. If that is not the case, I will have to go away and we will have to have some discussions.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Jim Fairlie
Yes—SPT can continue with its work.