The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2160 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
We will have a look at that. Ross Ewing raised that in a previous evidence session, in relation to situations where you can see or hear somebody. Let us consider what that means, and we will flesh that out.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
The public interest will have to be set out in the code of practice in the individual circumstances.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
Yes. I understand that there is a desire for clarity on the meaning of the term “public interest” in that context. The right place to do that is the code of practice and not in secondary legislation.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
The public interest will be determined by the consultation process that NatureScot goes through with the people who are involved with a deer management plan or whatever it is that they are doing. Does that make sense?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
I do not see that being a concern. There is definitely a difference between what lowland deer management will do and what upland and hill deer management will do, because there are deer management groups in those areas. Is the concern that deer management groups are being targeted as opposed to what is happening on low ground? We accept that there is a difference between the two areas.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
Stalkers do not need any training at the moment—that answers the argument, as it shows that we really should be doing something. As I said in my previous answer, we will bring in the measures at stage 2, and we will consider the best way to manage those who have been stalking for 30 or 40 years and who are more than competent but who do not have a certificate that says so. We will then consider how to manage the transition, ensuring that everybody gets up to that fit and competent standard.
I absolutely take on board the point that you are making. Right now, stalkers do not need anything at all; they need only a gun licence.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
All that people will have to do is report it. It is not the case that someone will have committed an offence for shooting a stray deer. If someone shoots a deer and it turns out to be a farmed deer, all they will have to do is report it within five days—that is all that is required.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
I think that QMS has more than enough on its plate in dealing with the products that it already deals with. Venison is a fairly unique product and should be marketed as such, and there is a lot that we can do that does not have to be done under the umbrella of QMS. It is also not something that we would need to legislate on. It is fine the way it is.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
I am genuinely not seeing the conflict here. The panel is advisory, NatureScot has to act reasonably and impartially in all its duties, and the panel must be approved by Scottish ministers. I do not see the issue being as dangerous to impartiality as other people think that it is. I just have a different opinion. I am sorry.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jim Fairlie
I cannot argue that off the top of my head, but if we cannot find the information just now, we will come back to the committee and give you any that we have on whether there is precedent for that.