The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2173 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
So there was no delay in people getting treatment after a diagnosis had been established.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
Dr Chopra, you may just have answered my question. Can you define who would require a named person?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
I want you to clarify something. That is not the same as somebody being given power of attorney.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
It is a separate thing.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
I do not know whether you addressed this earlier. You have to find a balance for all the competing sectors. Does that mean that you will consult over the coming year in relation to 2023? Will you be able to get everybody in the room to thrash out the problems?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
I apologise to my fellow committee members and to the panel. Unfortunately, my internet connection has been terrible and I have lost large chunks of the evidence session, so I apologise if my question has already been asked. It is specifically for Dr Needle and the scientists.
Clearly, cod is a very sensitive animal when it comes to its spawning. We have differing and competing challenges in the cod box area. Do we want to save the cod in a way that means the socioeconomic impacts are not felt by humans, or is it better to find a solution that saves the cod, given its sensitivity to all the other activity that is going on around it?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
That is a fair point. However, in the evidence that we heard last week, everybody told us, “We want to save the cod.” It appears to me that, given the sensitivity of the animal that we are trying to save, the precautionary principle is the one that we would have to take. Is that correct?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
I am sorry, but I am hearing only bits and pieces of the conversation.
I urge the cabinet secretary to get the fishing communities into the room to talk to each other about what needs to be done for next year. I will not support the motion to annul, because the precautionary principle is correct in trying to protect the cod stocks. We have heard from every stakeholder. They have all said the same thing, which is that they want the cod stocks to be protected. Clearly, there have been issues with the process, so it would be great if that could be improved, but, at this point, I will not support the motion to annul.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
Thank you. That is the point that I was making.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
Let me rephrase the question. I am looking for the balance between the mitigations that we have to take in order to save the cod and the socioeconomic impacts that we are being told about by the fishing community. Should we just let the cod be fished out of existence, or do we actually want to save it?