Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2388 contributions

|

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Long Covid Inquiry

Meeting date: 9 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

Sammie, would you like to come in?

11:00  

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Long Covid Inquiry

Meeting date: 9 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

Sorry, Jane. I am going to stick with you, because I am on a thread here. The rest of you can come in in a bit. If the range of symptoms can be distilled down, which areas need to be prioritised in co-ordinating care and help for long Covid sufferers?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Long Covid Inquiry

Meeting date: 9 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

I am going to challenge that, Ian, because we have had numerous committee meetings at which the BAME community, disabled communities and others have all been taken into consideration. Time and again, we have talked about messaging. We had Jason Leitch before us specifically to talk about how to target that messaging. I challenge the point that you are making.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Long Covid Inquiry

Meeting date: 9 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

Would acceptance of the existence of the disease not come before the assessment? Earlier, Ian Mullen said that people dismiss the idea that it exists in the form that it does.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Long Covid Inquiry

Meeting date: 9 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

Yes, the systems are important in terms of allowing people to deal with the illness.

Let me just clarify that you are not necessarily talking about long Covid clinics but about chronic illness clinics, for want of a better description.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

I am mindful of Jenni Minto’s point that other people are currently in the same waters and that there will have to be some balance.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

Following on from Jenni Minto’s question, is the type of gear that is used in inshore fisheries your biggest issue? You do not specifically mention gear in your petition.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

I agree that we should close the petition at this stage. The evidence that Bally Philp gave us was tremendous and very detailed, but we have heard only from that petitioner. There will be other people in the fishing community who will want to give as much evidence as he has given. We need to be mindful of the fact that the Government is doing its review, so I think that we should close the petition now and include the issues in the broader picture that we look at later in the parliamentary session.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

Welcome to the committee, Bally.

I know very little about fishing. The sum total of my fishing knowledge comes from a day out on a hand-dived scallop boat. I therefore come to this from a different perspective. It would seem, anecdotally, that a 3-mile limit worked because there were more fish in the past. What is the science behind the basis of the 3-mile limit? If a 3-mile limit were set up, what is the science that tells us the level that we are trying to return the fish stocks to?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Petition

Meeting date: 8 February 2023

Jim Fairlie

I appreciate that this is a difficult question session for you, Bally. Has there been scientific research into the matter, or is your evidence anecdotal? Is your position that we should close the area off for 10 years to see what happens? What would happen during that period? You have already talked about what happens to the communities that are reliant on fish at the moment. In those 10 years—or whatever period—of closure, you want the fish stocks to increase. What level would the fish stocks recover to? Would you start fishing all over again after that? You would already have displaced other fishing boats out of the system.

I am trying to consider the matter from the point of view of fairness. How do you ensure that what your petition is calling for is fair for everyone in the system?