The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2388 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
I said earlier that I think that the policy is going in exactly the right direction at the moment. I think that the consultations will iron out all those points. Other people are saying that we are going in the wrong direction, for this, that and the other reason. Do you feel that we are in a relatively good place to steer the bill to where it needs to be?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
I just plucked that figure off the top of my head. As somebody who used to receive calf payments, I would say that, if we are to reduce the number of cows as we are being told, that would be the only way to do it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
You also said earlier, however, that we cannot face a cliff edge, so we need to do this gradually and fit it in—you and I know that farmers are not the quickest to respond to the things that we are trying to get done. Is there a balance between making sure that we are not facing that cliff edge but, at the same time, allowing farmers to adopt the practices?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
Let me stop you there. Earlier, you talked about the public good with regard to how we deal with biodiversity and all the rest of it. Is producing food not a public good?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
What do you mean by “technically”?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
My apologies. I have taken up too much time already.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
I want to follow up the point that you made about tier 1 and tier 2 support. I think that we would recognise that there are opportunities to tackle the issues with climate change, biodiversity loss and all the rest of it, but we have to be able to farm viably. I have a concern—you might or might not be able to allay it—that in the proposals that we are considering, we are trying to do too much with a single pot of money, which will have to stretch much further than it needs to. Is that a genuine concern or can we manage that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
I apologise.
Jonnie, you said that farmers in England are taking a step back. Given the amount of support that is required to keep farming in Scotland viable, how do farmers take a step back if they do not like the policy?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
In effect, then, what you are saying is that, for the whole supply chain to work, you cannot try to find a solution for each individual bit—you have to look at the whole system that is in place.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jim Fairlie
We have roamed about on this issue, but I want to go back to the opportunities for the food and drink sector that you touched on in response to Ariane Burgess.
With regard to farmers’ ability to diversify, the CCC said last week that we needed to reduce numbers and all the rest of it, and, in that respect, I am very glad that you have mentioned critical mass, because that is the bit that I want to talk about. What if, for instance, we decided to say, “Right, we’re going to pay £1,000 for every calf that’s born on a hill, but you need to reduce the numbers of suckler cows that you produce by 20 or 30 per cent”? What would be the net effect of targeting just one specific problem in that way?