The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2665 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jim Fairlie
I was actually sitting in a lay-by at the time of the conversation.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jim Fairlie
I make this point purely on the basis that I absolutely agree that some of the responses that came back to members of the public and to people who were applying for licences were absolutely ludicrous—there is no dispute about that. However, that comment applied to one or two of the responses to the hundreds of licence applications that were made. I dispute Mr Ross’s characterisation of the organisation as incompetent. It is far from being incompetent, and it must take account of all the issues, not just an individual’s experience at one time.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jim Fairlie
It has not acted illegally. It has clarified that nuisance is not the same as health and safety.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jim Fairlie
Under the current legislation, it cannot do that. I cannot remember the exact wording, so this is perhaps not as it is set out in the act, but we cannot revert to what was done previously, because the act, or the protection, does not allow it. That is why NatureScot had to change its approach.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jim Fairlie
Given that it is mid-December, I suggest that there is time before the next breeding season, because NatureScot will be working at pace with local authorities to work out what it will do for next season. As I said, we can give a ministerial instruction to require NatureScot to do something, and that work is on-going. The fact that we are not in the breeding season right now indicates to me that there is still time for NatureScot to deliver those plans.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jim Fairlie
The plan not being—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jim Fairlie
No. Previously, licences had to be issued on the basis of health and safety rather than nuisance. What was happening previously was that health and safety and nuisance were being conflated.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jim Fairlie
The conditions are not legally binding; they are certainly not as legally strong as the bill that is in front of the committee. I return to point that I have made right from day 1 of trying to get through, first, the Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Act 2024 and then part 4 of the bill: it is about changing the narrative in Scotland. If there is absolute trust that everything that is going on in estates is good quality, well managed and all the rest of it, that changes the narrative. It changes the ridiculous position that we are in just now whereby people feel demonised for doing a particular job. I would like to change that.
Amendment 35 helps us to do that, because the people of Scotland will look at grouse moor management and say, “You know what? This is robustly regulated, they’re doing a very good job, they’re bringing money into our rural communities and they’re doing the things that help us to be Scotland plc.” However, without the trust, we will still be in a position in which people do not trust what is happening on estates. This is not about us trying to demonise or not trusting landowners; it is about ensuring that there is absolute certainty in everybody’s mind that what is happening in those places is good for Scotland.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jim Fairlie
Let me rephrase that: the conditions are not as legally strong. They do not have the same legal strength as the legislation that we are in the process of bringing in. The other part of it is that, if NatureScot is working with estates in drawing up boundaries, they have a discussion and negotiation—they come to an agreement. It is not done by one side or the other; it is done in agreement. The position that we are in will help to strengthen the robustness of the legislation, but it will also give security to landholders that they are portraying the image of a properly regulated, well-run business that is good for Scotland. That will help us to change the narrative, which, at the moment, is not as good as it could be.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jim Fairlie
Although amendment 253 is well intentioned, it contains a fundamental flaw. The provisions in the bill will not be commenced in unison—a staggered approach will be taken—so it is unclear when the proposed five-year review period would start.
In addition, as I have set out in amendment 74, the review that I propose will look at more than just sections 13 to 16 of the bill. It will look at all the modifications that have been made to the 1996 act.
I would be happy to work with Mr Eagle on my proposed mechanism for reviewing the operation and effectiveness of the modifications made to the 1996 act by part 4 of the bill. However, based on what I have said, I ask Mr Eagle not to move amendment 253. If he moves it, I ask members to oppose it.
Amendment 74 agreed to.
Amendment 253 not moved.