The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2089 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jim Fairlie
No, there has not been anything so far. As I say, our relationship with the UK Government at the moment is better than it has been, and we will continue to look to have a better working relationship. We are all wrestling with issues at the moment, which I hope will be better resolved through good dialogue rather than by going head to head. I hope that we continue to have a working relationship with the UK Government.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jim Fairlie
As far as I understand it, at this point, there is not.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jim Fairlie
Let me get this right. We are preparing and reviewing the code. The co-development of the code with a lot of stakeholders is on-going. A draft code was produced in 2024 and it has been user-tested with farmers and crofters; that work was also undertaken in 2024. The feedback received from that consultation and from research and scientific and academic information is being taken on board to develop the code.
It will be the best practice guide for farmers and crofters for all farm types and topographies. It intends to provide guidance and practical examples of types of activities and the way in which those activities can be carried out.
We do not have an exact date right now for when the code will be ready, but it is in development. It was road-tested in 2024 and we will continue to build on it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jim Fairlie
I am sorry—I missed the last part of your question.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jim Fairlie
I am not going to put an exact date on it, but we will look to have the code of practice out long before the end of the year.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jim Fairlie
The code is not legislation that has to be complied with. It provides guidance and it will help the farming community to understand what we are trying to deliver. Farmers will not be penalised for not following the code to the exact letter, but whether they have looked at the code will be taken into consideration. People will get things wrong because they have made a mistake, but other people may just say, “Pfft, I am not going to bother.” When farmers decide that they are going to get on board with the programme, whatever stage they are at, the code will be guidance to allow them to get as much information as they can, but it will not result in a penalty.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jim Fairlie
I have been trying to make sure that that is the kind of relationship that we have built up over the course of this session. We want to do this with people, not to them. That is part of the process. The code has an important role to play in helping people to understand what they will be required to do. I hope that it is not taken as “Here is a stick—you must do this.” It is part of how we develop that relationship.
As I have said before, I think that the Scottish Government has done a very good job of building that relationship so that it is co-operative. I am sure that it would have been easier to have said, “There is the policy—get on with it.” The tens of thousands of words that James Muldoon was talking about are our opportunity to get a full understanding of how people feel about things—because how they feel about them is as important as the reality—and then to think about how we deliver a piece of work that they can buy in to. The whole point is to get people to buy in to it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jim Fairlie
We are looking at nutrient management plans. I do not want to get into the technical aspects of each individual area at this stage. We will develop it: as I have said, the code of practice will be developed and laid before the Parliament long before the end of this year.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jim Fairlie
It is in their best interests to work with us to go on this transition. As I said in my answers to the convener, the code is not mandatory, but farmers want to get on board with it and be part of the process.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jim Fairlie
I disagree, convener. As I said, there was a crofter on the whole farm plan steering group and there was a discussion about having exemptions based on size, but that idea was rejected by that group, on which the crofting community was represented. Conversations are being had and I am more than happy to continue having them, but I can assure you that it is definitely not a one-way street. I sit on ARIOB, and points of view are put across.
Rhoda Grant said to me that it is a one-size-fits-all policy, but it is not. The whole point of the plans is that they create an opportunity for people to get involved at any level, and they do not necessarily have to pay to get the points that they need in order to be part of that scheme—I do not mean points as in points 1, 2 and 3; I mean the bits that they are required to do. It is certainly not a one-way street and it is certainly not one size fits all.