The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3352 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Mr Greene, I am conscious of the time, and I would like the discussion to remain focused on the SSI. If you have any further questions in that respect, that is fine, but if not, I will move on to Mr MacGregor.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
As members have no further questions, I thank the cabinet secretary and his officials for attending. I will suspend the meeting for a short time before we move on to the next agenda item.
12:19 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Item 4 is the committee’s consideration of the Prisons and Young Offenders Institutions (Coronavirus) (Scotland) Amendment (No 2) Rules 2021. Do members have any comments on the SSI?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
As no further members have indicated that they have comments on the specific content of the letter, we will write to the Public Audit Committee and invite further correspondence from the relevant minister.
That concludes the public part of the meeting. Our next meeting will be on 6 October, when we will begin our budget scrutiny.
12:40 Meeting continued in private until 13:01.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I agree with the comments that have been made, so I will not repeat them. Does Mr MacGregor wish to add anything?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
For clarity and to recap, the SSI has been laid under the negative procedure, which means that there is no requirement for us to endorse the SSI or vote for it to come into force. The SSI will come into force unless Parliament agrees a motion to annul.
However, we have shared some concerns about the provisions in the SSI. I suggest that the minute of the meeting states that the committee makes no recommendation on the SSI but notes that some committee members have expressed concerns about certain provisions of the SSI and notes that those concerns are set out in the public record in the Official Report of the meeting.
Are members content with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Okay. Thank you very much.
In light of our discussion, I propose that we write in due course to the cabinet secretary and the Scottish Prison Service to raise additional points, and that we invite the cabinet secretary back to provide further updates on the situation in relation to the provisions of the SSI.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much, Professor Paterson. Ian Moir, will you come in on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
The committee will look at the fee structure and arrangements in due course, but thanks for that. Russell Findlay is next.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 September 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, Dr Scott. I want to keep the discussion moving. Does Collette Stevenson have a follow-up question?