The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3352 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
We will pick up on that after questions from Rona Mackay.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Members will be aware that we are coming to the end of the current 16 days of activism against gender-based violence. Our next item is consideration of evidence on efforts to improve the ways in which we prosecute violence against women and girls and to support survivors of such crimes. I refer members to papers 1 to 4.
The committee is carrying out this work to shine a light on an important subject. This is the first of three evidence sessions. In later weeks, we will hear from Police Scotland, the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Veterans and the Lord Advocate. We want to know what our police service, courts, prosecution service and Government are doing to tackle violence against women and girls.
I welcome two senior representatives of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service: David Fraser, executive director of court operations; and Danielle McLaughlin, head of implementation of the Lord Justice Clerk’s review.
I thank all the people we have spoken to about this subject. We recognise that it takes immense courage to talk about this and I pay tribute to everyone who has done so. It really helps to inform our views. I also thank Danielle and David for joining us today. I expect the session to last for 60 to 90 minutes. I make my usual plea for succinct questions and answers.
I will open the questioning. As we are aware, Lady Dorrian’s review of the management of sexual offence cases was published earlier in the year. Given that we are nearly a year on from its publication, I would like to begin with a general question about the progress that has been made on the recommendations that were made in that report. What steps are being taken to implement some of the recommendations?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I will hand over to Danielle McLaughlin to pick up on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Diane Barr, one of our clerks, has helpfully checked and the video appears to be on the Rape Crisis Scotland website.
I am watching the clock. I will move towards closing this evidence session with a couple of final questions, the first of which is about the follow-up process for survivors in the aftermath of a case or trial. During our evidence sessions, a survivor spoke about the difficulties that she experienced in accessing court reports and documents that she felt might have been a helpful part of her healing process. There was a cost involved in sourcing the documents. Would that be the case and, if so, why? Is there an opportunity to ensure that materials are accessible, given the positive role that access to them might play?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Fulton MacGregor and then pick up on a final question before we move on.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you—that was helpful. We have some outstanding questions on support for victims. Jamie Greene, would you like to come in on that issue?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Does Rona Mackay have any further questions in that area?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
On the point that the domestic abuse court would be neither the High Court nor a sheriff court, you talked about sentencing powers. In the High Court, sentencing powers are unlimited, but what sort of sentencing approach would fit with a specialist domestic abuse court?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
On that note, I bring this part of the meeting to a close. Thank you both very much for your participation today.
Next week, we will be joined by a senior representative of Police Scotland and the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Veterans.
11:45 Meeting continued in private until 12:40.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. I am interested in your comments about taking evidence by commission, which we know is under way already, albeit on a limited basis.
It was helpful to receive that update. In my introductory remarks, I mentioned the evidence sessions that we have had. I think that it is safe to say that some of the witnesses we have spoken to were less than complimentary about a range of aspects of their court experiences. I would like to pick up on your comments about some changes that could be made in early course, such as expanding the taking of evidence by commission. In light of the evidence that we have been given, it seems pressing to us to deal with many aspects of the court system. What could be done soon to begin addressing some of those challenges?
10:15