The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3352 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The practical issues of timing and availability of solicitors and facilities were certainly highlighted in both Paul Smith’s and Simon Brown’s submissions.
I have a follow-up question for Stuart Munro. You made an interesting point in your written submission—it is just at the bottom of page 7 in our paper 3—about proposed new section 303K of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, which indicates that the court must issue directions for appearing by electronic means. You said:
“We consider it essential that those directions contain measures that ensure that witnesses are not susceptible to any undue influence and the effective participation of the accused is guaranteed. For achieving this, an appropriate connection network and suitable electronic devices are critical.”
Do you want to add to that? It was an interesting point.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That came up in the evidence from our first panel of witnesses. We will have the Crown Office and the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service before us next week. We will have plenty to ask about the logistics of court processes. Thank you both very much. That has been helpful.
We now move into private.
12:19 Meeting continued in private until 13:01.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I bring in Sharon Dowey for a very brief supplementary, and then I will bring in Liam Kerr for a final question.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will stick with part 1. Kate Wallace, I was interested in the comments in your submission about the proposals on digital productions. Rightly, you highlighted the issues that victims of sexual crime potentially have to face when it comes to personal effects such as clothing being taken possession of for forensic examination and production. I am interested in hearing a bit more about why you think that the provision is a positive step forward, if you like, with particular reference to sexual offences.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I have a couple of other questions, which are again for you, Kate. One proposal in part 2 is for reviews to be carried out in parallel with other proceedings, such as criminal proceedings. However, the Lord Advocate would have discretion to end a review in the spirit of preventing prejudice to other proceedings. What are your views on that provision? Is it an appropriate arrangement?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We are coming up to time, but members want to ask one or two more questions. If our witnesses are prepared and able to bear with us, we will run for an extra 10 minutes or so. With that, I bring in Fulton MacGregor.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That is us just a little bit over time, but it has been a very helpful session. I thank everyone for joining us today—it is most appreciated. We will have a short suspension to allow for a changeover of witnesses.
11:12 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We are now joined by our second panel of witnesses. I welcome Kate Wallace, chief executive officer of Victim Support Scotland, and Adam Stachura, associate director of policy, communications and external affairs at Age Scotland. Welcome to you both, and thank you for your written submissions, which were circulated ahead of today’s meeting. I intend to allow around 60 minutes for this evidence session.
As always, I will open up with a general question, and it concerns the provisions in parts 1 and 2 of the bill. I appreciate that each of you probably has a stronger interest in different parts of the bill. Kate Wallace will be interested in part 2, while Adam Stachura is probably more interested in part 1.
The committee has an overall sense of your views on the provisions in the bill, but I specifically want to ask about any areas of concern. I will bring in Adam Stachura first, and then Kate Wallace. You can refer to whichever part of the bill you are interested in.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Our next item is stage 1 scrutiny of the Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill. We are joined by Simon Brown, president of the Scottish Solicitors Bar Association; Stuart Munro, convener of the criminal law committee at the Law Society of Scotland; and Paul Smith, president of the Edinburgh Bar Association. Thank you for taking the time to attend today’s meeting and for your written submissions, which were helpful for committee members.
I will bring in Ben Macpherson.
09:45