The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3352 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Yes; I might be paraphrasing. However, might the main reason why cases would be transferred be to do with trying to get more throughput and a speedier or more efficient service? Is that the case in the example that Stuart Munro gave of the High Court?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning, and welcome to the third meeting in 2025 of the Criminal Justice Committee. We have no apologies this morning.
Our first item of business is an oral evidence-taking session on an affirmative Scottish statutory instrument. We are joined by the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs, Angela Constance, and Scottish Government officials Susan Black, who is a senior policy officer in the civil law and legal systems division, and Emma Thomson, who is a solicitor in the legal directorate. I welcome you all to the meeting.
I refer members to paper 1. I intend to allow up to 15 minutes for this evidence session. I invite the cabinet secretary to make some opening remarks on the instrument.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I thank the cabinet secretary and her officials for joining us. I suspend the meeting for a few minutes to allow for a changeover of witnesses.
09:36 Meeting suspended.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you.
I refer members to papers 3 and 4. I intend to allow around 75 minutes for this evidence session. I will start with my usual general opening question. I will come to Stuart Munro first, and then bring in Simon Brown and Paul Smith.
Part 1 of the bill makes changes in relation to procedures in criminal courts. The committee found your submissions very helpful in getting a sense of your organisations’ overall views on the proposals. Will you outline any issues or areas of concern that you have with the provisions in part 1?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. That was very clearly set out. I will bring in Kate Wallace. Just as a reminder, my original question was about issues and areas of concern that you might have about the bill.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That is helpful. I will now open questions up to members.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Yes.
11:30Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
More broadly, one of the things that came out of your submission was the importance of choice being made available to victims, which means that some of the proposed provisions may be relevant down the line if the bill is passed. How important is that with regard to the services that you provide?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I have a question for Kate Wallace. A significant part of your submission details your views about broadening the scope of part 2 to include child homicides and suicides. I am interested to hear a bit more about the thinking behind that and why you feel it important to include that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
It does. I was just slightly unclear about what you set out in your written submission, so your answer has been helpful in clarifying what you understand by and mean by connected death.
On the review process, another thing that I picked up from your submission concerned membership of the review oversight committee. You also set out some thoughts on access to reports that are produced by the committee and said that you believe that it is pertinent to allow families to access a full copy of a report if they wish. Can you share any more detail on those two points?