The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3352 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will bring in Neil Websdale on the broad question about lessons learned. I have a specific question within that about timescales. Once we have undertaken or completed the learning process, should timescales apply to how lessons are applied in changing practices?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Mr Kerr is going to pass, so I will bring in Ben Macpherson.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Welcome back, everyone. We now move on to our second panel of witnesses. I am pleased to welcome Professor John Devaney from the University of Edinburgh; Professor Neil Websdale, director of the family violence centre at Arizona State University, who is joining us remotely—a warm welcome to you, Professor Websdale; I hope that you can hear us loud and clear; and Dr Grace Boughton, criminologist. Thank you all for attending today’s meeting. I apologise for the slight overrunning of the first panel.
I thank Professor Devaney and Dr Boughton for their submissions, which have been circulated ahead of today’s meeting. I particularly thank Dr Boughton, as she has travelled from England to join us this morning. As I said, Professor Websdale is joining us from Arizona, where it is maybe 4 am or 5 am—if he disappears for another cup of strong coffee, we will understand why. Thank you all for coming.
I will allow up to 75 minutes for questions. Before we start, I propose to members that, in order to allow enough time for this session, if required, we will defer our private session, which is a review of today’s evidence. We will see how the timing goes.
I start with a general opening question on part 2 of the bill, which sets out a framework for a system of domestic homicide and suicide reviews. I hope that John Devaney and Grace Boughton were able to listen to some of the evidence that we took earlier on part 2. I will come to John first, followed by Grace; then I will bring in Neil Websdale.
What are your general views on the principle in part 2 of having a statutory system of reviews in this area?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. Rona Mackay, did you want to come in to follow up on definitions?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I have two final requests to ask brief questions, to which, I hope, we will get succinct answers. I will bring in Liam Kerr and then Pauline McNeill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We will have a brief question from Pauline McNeill, after which we will have to move on to consideration of part 2 of the bill.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Grace Boughton, do you have any final points on that issue?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That brings us up to time. I thank the witnesses very much. I thank Neil Websdale for joining us from Arizona—he can head off to bed now.
I am conscious that it is coming up to 1 o’clock. Are members happy for us to defer agenda item 2, which is consideration of evidence? We will pick that up next week if we are all happy with that proposal.
Members indicated agreement.
Meeting closed at 12:52.Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. Ben Macpherson has a question.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning, and welcome to the fourth meeting in 2025 of the Criminal Justice Committee. We have received no apologies this morning.
Our first item of business is to continue our stage 1 scrutiny of the Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill. We have a good panel of witnesses. I am pleased to welcome Laura Buchan, from the policy and engagement division of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, and Dr Emma Forbes, the national lead for domestic abuse for the Crown Office; Malcolm Graham, the chief executive of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service; and Superintendent Richard Thomas and Detective Superintendent Adam Brown from Police Scotland. I offer a warm welcome to you all. Thank you for taking the time to attend today’s meeting and for your submissions, which have been very helpful.
I intend to allow about 75 minutes for this session. I refer members to papers 1 and 2. To get the session under way, I will start with a pretty broad question that focuses on part 1 of the bill. I propose to bring in Laura Buchan first, followed by Malcolm Graham and Superintendent Richard Thomas.
Part 1 of the bill makes a range of changes to the procedures in criminal courts. In order for the committee to get a sense of your overall views of the proposals, could you briefly outline any provisions in part 1 in relation to which you have any issues or concern? When we started our evidence taking last week, issues came up relating to resourcing and the practical implications of the provisions.