The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3352 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for that. Marsha, do you want to come in?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I put that question to Fiona Drouet.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
A few members still want to come in and I am conscious of the time, so I ask for succinct questions and answers.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you for those interesting points. As well as the review process, there is a duty of care wrapped around that process that we need to think about—you mentioned publication. One of the key objectives of the review process is learning lessons and improving practices. Before I bring in Marsha Scott, I would be interested to hear any other thoughts that you have on the output from and outcomes of the process. Is what is proposed enough or should there be more consideration of liability, which is not in the bill at the moment? Does the bill have the right balance?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you, Marsha. Fiona, do you want to add to that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We are now joined by our second panel of witnesses this morning: Katie Brown, equally safe policy manager at the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities; Graeme Simpson, chief social work officer at Aberdeen City Council, here representing Social Work Scotland; and Dr Emma Fletcher, director of public health at NHS Tayside. Welcome to you all, and thank you for your written submissions, which have been circulated in advance of today’s meeting. I intend to allow about 60 minutes for this evidence session.
As with our previous panel, I will start with a general opening question. I will work from my left and then move across the panel. I will therefore start with Katie Brown, followed by Graeme Simpson and then Emma Fletcher.
Can you set out in general terms your organisation’s views on part 2 of the bill and the system of abusive domestic behaviour reviews? What, if any, improvements or refinements would you like to make? In short, do you have any particular areas of concern, or are there aspects of the provisions in the bill that you particularly welcome?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Pauline McNeill, I think that you were looking to come in with a follow-up question on that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you—that is helpful.
My final question concerns an issue that we discussed with the previous panel—you may have been in the room when we talked about training. I am interested in your views on getting that balance whereby we have a body of experts and knowledgeable individuals who can undertake reviews. Are there points about training that you are keen to make? Staff working across public services get abstracted to go on lots of training, and I am interested in your views on that aspect of the preparatory work around the introduction of a review process.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
I will pick up on a final point on part 2 of the bill, and then members will ask questions on part 1.
Marsha, you touch on part 1 in your submission, but my final question on part 2 is around training for members of the review oversight committee and/or for panel members. My thinking is that training would be appropriate for panel members in particular, but I am interested in hearing your thoughts on that proposal. I ask Fiona to answer first, and then Marsha.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Did you want to come in, Marsha Scott?