The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3352 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much. I am conscious of time, so I will move on to other members.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
We have time for a couple of final questions. I will come in first with a question on existing systems of review and the potential for crossover and then I will bring in Fulton MacGregor.
The committee has received evidence that raised concerns about adding a new system, or a new layer, of reviews to an already complex review landscape. There were also suggestions that a bit more could be done in existing systems of review to incorporate or align with the bill’s proposals. Has any consideration been given to ensuring that the various review processes are aligned and that organisations will not be overwhelmed by their competing demands?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much. As members have no further questions, I will draw our session to a close, and I thank the cabinet secretary and her team for their attendance.
We look forward to the cabinet secretary joining us again next week, when we will hear a wee bit more about her proposals for amendments to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill at stage 2.
11:33 Meeting continued in private until 12:51.Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Good morning, and welcome to the sixth meeting in 2025 of the Criminal Justice Committee. We have received no apologies. Katy Clark will be joining us shortly.
Our main item of business is to continue our stage 1 scrutiny of the Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill. I am very pleased that we are joined by Angela Constance, the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs; Vallath Kavitha Krishnan, the bill team leader in the criminal justice reform unit; Vicky Carmichael, the team leader of the violence against women and girls justice unit; and Louise Miller, a solicitor in the Scottish Government legal directorate. Thank you very much for joining us.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2. I intend to allow up to 90 minutes for the session.
I invite the cabinet secretary to make some opening remarks.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The final question will be asked by Fulton MacGregor.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you.
Cabinet secretary, before we get under way, I wonder whether I could take the liberty of beginning with a question that I hope you will not mind my asking. I appreciate that it might not sit entirely within the scope of the bill. You might recall that, last year, the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee led a debate on a petition calling for the creation of a specific offence that would enable courts to hand down longer sentences when miscarriage has been caused by an act of domestic violence. In your contribution, you said that you believed that there should be a statutory aggravator for causing miscarriage through such violence. Given the consensual nature of that debate, and the points covered in it, will you now consider introducing such an aggravator? Are you willing to meet me to discuss its possible introduction at stage 2 of the bill process?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
That was reassuring and very clear. I call Rona Mackay and will then bring in Fulton MacGregor.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you very much, cabinet secretary. I propose that, in order to protect appropriate time for questions on each part of the bill, members should ask questions on part 2 first, and then we will return to part 1. Do members agree to that?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Rona Mackay will ask the final question.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 February 2025
Audrey Nicoll
Thank you. There was a lot in those responses, which is helpful. I open the discussion to members.