Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 20 April 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3352 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

The people’s panel recommended that

“All services should be able to refer to each other”

and that funding should be in place to allow that to happen. You said that you listened to the evidence from the previous panel, where there was discussion about the services in local areas not necessarily being connected in the way that they need to be. We welcome the Government’s response to that recommendation, which states:

“We will explore this further to better understand the specific barriers the court service and police have in referring to third sector organisations.”

Can you provide the committee with a wee bit more detail on what that will involve?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

That is super. Thank you. We might be able to come back to that if there is time later in the session.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

The people’s panel recommended

“a guaranteed and protected five year minimum period of funding for community and third sector services”.

That theme has been discussed across the Parliament this year. Can you provide the committee with more detail on the fairer funding pilot scheme that you mention in your response to the people’s panel report? Does the Scottish Government intend to go a wee bit further than its current commitment of providing funding and grants for two years?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

In your response, you refer to data sharing, which is a crucial part of the effectiveness of referral and other processes. I am interested in hearing a wee bit more detail on what you are looking to do to improve data-sharing mechanisms and the robustness of the data that is collected.

10:30  

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee, and Social Justice and Social Security Committee (Joint Meeting) [Draft]

Tackling Drug Deaths and Drug Harm

Meeting date: 20 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Good morning. My question touches on points that were raised earlier, particularly by Helen Douglas and Alison Weir. It is all very well for things to be in place, but are they working properly? Perhaps this is an opportunity for us to look under the bonnet a wee bit, to see what needs to change.

James Allan, your report made three recommendations under the justice and law reform theme. One said that

“All services should be able to refer to each other”

and that funding should be provided to support that. I am interested in hearing about any evidence that that is not currently taking place. What are the barriers and obstacles to that happening properly?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Thank you very much, cabinet secretary. That is appreciated.

We will move on to part 2 of the bill. I will begin by asking a question about the proposed definition of domestic abuse. You have helpfully outlined why you have settled on the definition that is set out in the bill. However, as you have acknowledged, we heard a range of views on the proposed definition, including that it is too broad and is out of line with Scotland’s current definition. One recent witness, Dr Emma Forbes, described it as borrowing

“too much from other jurisdictions when we should be setting our own path.”—[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 29 January 2025; c 27.]

Could you add a little more detail on the thinking behind the range of situations that might be subject to a domestic homicide or suicide review?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

We have a bit to get through, so I am keen to encourage succinct questions and answers—I should have asked for that earlier. I will bring in Pauline McNeill.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

Thank you. I note the provisions in the bill that say that a case review panel could be instructed to carry out its review in conjunction with another form of review. That is reassuring.

I am conscious of time, so I will bring in Fulton MacGregor. We will then move on to part 1.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

I will now move us on to part 1. I will go first to Liam Kerr—once he is ready—and I will then bring in Pauline McNeill.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice Modernisation and Abusive Domestic Behaviour Reviews (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 February 2025

Audrey Nicoll

A couple of members still have questions, but I just want to ask about digital productions and the authentication of electronic copy documents. In relation to digital productions, some concerns have been expressed that the original physical item—the physical production—might be disposed of before the potential evidence benefits of retaining it have been fully explored. What work is being done on a retention and disposal policy? Given some of the evidence that we have heard, might there be scope to make the position clearer in the bill?