The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3352 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The question is, that amendment 174 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The question is, that amendment 175 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
There will be a division.
For
Dowey, Sharon (South Scotland) (Con)
Kerr, Liam (North East Scotland) (Con)
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Mackay, Rona (Strathkelvin and Bearsden) (SNP)
Macpherson, Ben (Edinburgh Northern and Leith) (SNP)
Nicoll, Audrey (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP))
Abstentions
Clark, Katy (West Scotland) (Lab)
McNeill, Pauline (Glasgow) (Lab)
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The result of the division is: For 6, Against 0, Abstentions 2.
Amendment 175 agreed to.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The question is, that amendment 176 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The result of the division is: For 6, Against 0, Abstentions 2.
Amendment 176 agreed to.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The result of the division is: For 6, Against 0, Abstentions 2.
Amendment 177 agreed to.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The question is, that amendment 178 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The result of the division is: For 6, Against 0, Abstentions 2.
Amendment 178 agreed to.
Amendment 61 not moved.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Audrey Nicoll
The next group is on the victim notification scheme and referrals to victim support services. Amendment 172, in the name of the Minister for Victims and Community Safety, is grouped with amendments 173 to 178, 61, 237, 238 and 243 to 245.
I call the minister to speak to and move amendment 172, and to speak to the other amendments in the group.