The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 853 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jenni Minto
I am sorry, convener, but I was hoping to hear from Robbie Marsland.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jenni Minto
Thank you all for your evidence so far.
I want to return to the bill’s title—the Hunting with Dogs (Scotland) Bill—and its references to
“hunting a wild mammal using a dog”.
All the definitions that we have heard on rough shooting today have used the word “flushing”, not “hunting”. You might have inadvertently used the word “hunting” yourself, convener, when you were giving the example of your four Labs, but you then corrected yourself.
As I understand it—and please correct me if I am wrong—the exception in section 3 allows someone to
“search for, stalk or flush from cover”.
That is basically what we are talking about as rough shooting. I would like clarification that my understanding of that is correct.
The other area that I want to ask about relates to something that Jake Swindells has just said about the definition of “a pack”. Again, section 3 requires that
“reasonable steps are taken to ensure that any dog used in the activity does not join with others to form a pack of more than two dogs”.
To me, that implies that “a pack” is more than two dogs—in other words, three dogs.
DS Telford, it would be interesting to get your thoughts on the reference to “reasonable steps”, and I would also like to hear views on that from Robbie Marsland and from one of the witnesses who are shooters, whether it be Ross Ewing or Jake Swindells.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2022
Jenni Minto
I will be brief. The responses to our questions highlight how inextricably linked everything around Europe is and how what happens in Westminster severely impacts on what goes on in Scotland. I was interested to hear the comments from you and George Macpherson on how the continuity act is not the only way in which we in Scotland are maintaining our links with European law. I would like to hear a couple of examples of that, so that the normal person might be able to put things into perspective.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Jenni Minto
We took some additional evidence prior to this evidence session. The League Against Cruel Sports stated that the proposed legislation is very clear and that rough shooting remains legal under the bill, provided each person in attendance controls no more than two dogs and the dogs do not form a pack. For the record, can you give us the definition of “a pack” as opposed to several dogs working independently?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Jenni Minto
For the record, can you give me the dictionary definition of “a pack”, please?
While we are waiting, perhaps we could get an indication of what the difference is in dogs working independently.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 16 November 2022
Jenni Minto
Okay. Thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2022
Jenni Minto
I read somewhere that EU legislation on the testing of cosmetics on animals is part of this, so there could be a negative impact if such legislation is lost.
Does Mr Livingstone have any comments?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2022
Jenni Minto
I thank the witnesses for the documents and information that they have given us.
I have a question about the practical impact of the legislation on the normal person in the street. I note what Dr Hancox said about the deregulatory agenda and how that might impact on the way in which we live our lives. Mr Clancy, I also note the comment in the Law Society’s submission about the definition of “burden” and how that might impact in terms of a race to the bottom, which was raised in the House of Commons, too. On the practical impacts, I thought that Professor Young’s example of the working time directive was a strong one. Could our witnesses give us other examples that we can focus on in terms of the practical impacts of the bill?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 10 November 2022
Jenni Minto
I am thinking of known unknowns, unknown unknowns and so on.
I will go to Mr Clancy next.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2022
Jenni Minto
I thank Rae McKenzie and Morag Milne for joining us. Like Alasdair Allan, I have a constituency that is impacted by geese, as Islay and Tiree are part of it. Rae and I often meet on Kilchoman beach while walking our dogs. I can attest to the number of seabirds that were, sadly, washed up on Islay’s shores as a result of bird flu.
Morag Milne, in your answers to my colleague Rachael Hamilton, you have gone into some of the issues that I was hoping to ask about. As both witnesses have mentioned, not every situation is the same in the four pilot areas. What are the major differences between them? What have you and the communities learned from the work that is being done?